Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 15 reviews
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 15 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: G FIT AS 58, S FIT AS 59.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Level60Why this score
Source G FIT AS S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 55 55 G FIT AS: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60
S FIT AS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Level58Why this score
Source G FIT AS S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 53 54 G FIT AS: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
S FIT AS: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.8 = 58
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
G FIT AS +950Why this score
Source G FIT AS S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 51 37 G FIT AS: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 59
S FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Level61Why this score
Source G FIT AS S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 58 58 G FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
S FIT AS: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61
No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS or S FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1267Why this score
Source G FIT AS S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 48 56 G FIT AS: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55
S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
56
Handling (owners)
G FIT AS +155Why this score
Source G FIT AS S FIT AS Reviews found online 56 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G FIT AS | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 59 |
| Dry | 60 | 60 |
| Wet | 58 | 58 |
| Snow | 59 | 50 |
| Comfort | 61 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
G FIT AS
S FIT AS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G FIT AS | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Laufenn G FIT AS
Laufenn S FIT AS
Too close to call: Laufenn G FIT AS and Laufenn S FIT AS are within 2 points overall. Laufenn G FIT AS is stronger on snow. Laufenn S FIT AS is stronger on treadwear. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 67 vs 55 on treadwear.
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 59 vs 50 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G FIT AS or S FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, G FIT AS or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 58 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, G FIT AS or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, G FIT AS or S FIT AS?
Laufenn G FIT AS, 59 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, G FIT AS or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, G FIT AS or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology