Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 15 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 15 + 120 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate+ is ahead, 80–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 120 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
CrossClimate+ +2787Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 55 77 G FIT AS: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60
CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 87
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
CrossClimate+ +2381Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 53 81 G FIT AS: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58
CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 81.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
CrossClimate+ +968Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 50 73 G FIT AS: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 59
CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 68
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
CrossClimate+ +1475Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 58 77 G FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77.1 = 75
No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 68 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
55
Treadwear
CrossClimate+ +2782Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 48 80 G FIT AS: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55
CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
56
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate+ +1672Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Reviews found online 56 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source G FIT AS CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G FIT AS | Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 80 |
| Dry | 60 | 87 |
| Wet | 58 | 81 |
| Snow | 59 | 68 |
| Comfort | 61 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
G FIT AS
80
/ 100
CrossClimate+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Tire B CrossClimate+
Pros
- Strong snow and cold-weather traction for an all-season tyre, with many owners reporting winter-tyre-like confidence on snow, slush and hills, including on front-wheel-drive cars.
- Excellent dry handling and steering response with precise, summer-tyre-like feel, along with generally very good wet grip and braking.
- Long tread life: many reports of 30,000–55,000+ km or miles with low wear, including taxi and van use and 4-year/50,000-mile ownership.
Cons
- Performance degradation with age: several owners report grip (wet and snow), noise and ride deteriorating after about 1–2 years, with hardening or cracking of the rubber in some cases.
- Limitations on ice, packed snow and deep or steep snow, where some owners found them inferior to dedicated winter tyres or to rivals such as the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
- Wet-weather concerns for some, including aquaplaning, being pulled around by standing water, and scary steering feel as the tyres aged.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G FIT AS | B · Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 13″ – 19″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Laufenn G FIT AS
80
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate+
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better dry, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 81 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 72 vs 56 on handling.
Tire A · Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G FIT AS or CrossClimate+?
Which is better in the wet, G FIT AS or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G FIT AS or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, G FIT AS or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 68 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, G FIT AS or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, G FIT AS or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology