Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G FIT AS vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue ECO is ahead, 66–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire ALaufenn

G FIT AS

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 14 reviews

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire BNexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    N Blue ECO +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASN Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5866

    G FIT AS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 59

    Wet

    N Blue ECO +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASN Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5569

    G FIT AS: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 59

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASN Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    G FIT AS: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 58

    No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    N Blue ECO +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASN Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5963

    G FIT AS: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS or N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    N Blue ECO +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASN Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4856

    G FIT AS: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 57

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue ECO +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceG FIT ASN Blue ECO
    Reviews found online5766
Scores at a glance
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Nexen N Blue ECO: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn G FIT ASNexen N Blue ECO
Relative Score 59 66
Dry 61 66
Wet 59 69
Snow 58 –
Comfort 64 66
Treadwear 55 60
Handling (owners) 57 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

G FIT AS

N Blue ECO

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G FIT AS

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent dry pavement grip and handling

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
  • Inadequate winter and snow performance
  • Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
All owner themes in the G FIT AS review

Tire B N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G FIT AS B · Nexen N Blue ECO
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available124
Rim diameters16″13″ – 16″

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G FIT AS

Nexen N Blue ECO

Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 60 vs 55 on treadwear.

Tire A · Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire B · Nexen N Blue ECO

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?

Which is better in the wet, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 60 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology