Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 14 reviews
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
N Blue ECO is ahead, 66–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
N Blue ECO +566Why this score
Source G FIT AS N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 58 66 G FIT AS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61
N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
59
Wet
N Blue ECO +1069Why this score
Source G FIT AS N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 55 69 G FIT AS: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 59
N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
58
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source G FIT AS N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 51 – G FIT AS: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 58
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
64
Comfort
N Blue ECO +266Why this score
Source G FIT AS N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 59 63 G FIT AS: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64
N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS or N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Treadwear
N Blue ECO +560Why this score
Source G FIT AS N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 48 56 G FIT AS: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55
N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
57
Handling (owners)
N Blue ECO +966Why this score
Source G FIT AS N Blue ECO Reviews found online 57 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G FIT AS | Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 66 |
| Dry | 61 | 66 |
| Wet | 59 | 69 |
| Snow | 58 | – |
| Comfort | 64 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
G FIT AS
N Blue ECO
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Tire B N Blue ECO
Pros
- Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
- Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
- Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
- Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G FIT AS | B · Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 13″ – 16″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Laufenn G FIT AS
Nexen N Blue ECO
Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 59 on wet.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 57 on handling.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 61 on dry.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 60 vs 55 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?
Which is better in the wet, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, G FIT AS or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 60 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology