Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ vs Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 3 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison82Why this score
Source G Fit EQ+ S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests – 80 Reviews found online – 85 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 85.3 = 82
-
–
Wet
No comparison76Why this score
Source G Fit EQ+ S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests – 74 Reviews found online – 79 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 78.5 = 76
-
–
Comfort
No comparison73Why this score
Source G Fit EQ+ S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 66 Reviews found online – 78 S Fit EQ+: 40% × 66 + 60% × 77.9 = 73
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source G Fit EQ+ S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) S Fit EQ+: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for S Fit EQ+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison56Why this score
Source G Fit EQ+ S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 42 Reviews found online – 76 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 42.1 + 40% × 76 = 56
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison84Why this score
Source G Fit EQ+ S Fit EQ+ Reviews found online – 84 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source G Fit EQ+ S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G Fit EQ+ | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 75 |
| Dry | – | 82 |
| Wet | – | 76 |
| Comfort | – | 73 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | – | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 84 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
G Fit EQ+
75
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | G Fit EQ+ | S Fit EQ+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/16 2022 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 15 Inch | #9/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Fit EQ+
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions
- Reliable handling on dry surfaces
- Strong value for money
Cons
- Slightly elevated road noise reported during operation
Tire B S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet road grip with stable handling
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Stiffer ride quality or firmness in colder conditions (below 10°C)
- Concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and occasional manufacturing flaws (e.g., a hump in one tire)
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G Fit EQ+ | B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 34 | 74 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit EQ+
75
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Only Laufenn S Fit EQ+ has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Tire B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology