Tests 49 · 1 test Owners 44 · 7 reviews
Laufenn I FIT vs Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 7 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
SNOWPROX S 952 is ahead, 75–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
SNOWPROX S 952 +2474Why this score
Source I FIT SNOWPROX S 952 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 41 78 I FIT: 60% × 56.5 (est.) + 40% × 40.6 = 50
SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
43
Wet
SNOWPROX S 952 +3679Why this score
Source I FIT SNOWPROX S 952 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 49 ≈ 77 (est.) Reviews found online 34 82 I FIT: 60% × 49 + 40% × 34.1 = 43
SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 79
No road tests of wet for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source I FIT SNOWPROX S 952 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 58 – I FIT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 63
No road tests of snow for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
55
Comfort
SNOWPROX S 952 +1671Why this score
Source I FIT SNOWPROX S 952 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 49 71 I FIT: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.8 = 55
SNOWPROX S 952: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
SNOWPROX S 952 +1569Why this score
Source I FIT SNOWPROX S 952 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 46 71 I FIT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 54
SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
38
Handling (owners)
SNOWPROX S 952 +3775Why this score
Source I FIT SNOWPROX S 952 Reviews found online 38 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn I FIT | Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 75 |
| Dry | 50 | 74 |
| Wet | 43 | 79 |
| Snow | 63 | – |
| Comfort | 55 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 38 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
I FIT
SNOWPROX S 952
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A I FIT
Pros
- Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand
Cons
- Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
- Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
- Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
Tire B SNOWPROX S 952
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence on snow and ice
- Strong durability and slow tread wear
- Excellent value for money
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, particularly at higher speeds
- Potential for audible feedback during aggressive dry cornering
- Inconsistent performance feedback for non-winter driving scenarios
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn I FIT | B · Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Laufenn I FIT
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952
Winner: Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn I FIT rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 75 vs 38 on handling.
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 79 vs 43 on wet.
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 74 vs 50 on dry.
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 71 vs 55 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?
Which is better in the wet, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 79 vs 43 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 74 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 71 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?
Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology