Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn I FIT vs Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 7 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

SNOWPROX S 952 is ahead, 75–48

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn I FIT
Tire ALaufenn

I FIT

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests 49 · 1 test Owners 44 · 7 reviews

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952
Tire BToyo

SNOWPROX S 952

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    SNOWPROX S 952 +24
    74
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online4178

    I FIT: 60% × 56.5 (est.) + 40% × 40.6 = 50

    SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    No road tests of dry for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 43

    Wet

    SNOWPROX S 952 +36
    79
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests49≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online3482

    I FIT: 60% × 49 + 40% × 34.1 = 43

    SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 79

    No road tests of wet for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online58–

    I FIT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 63

    No road tests of snow for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    SNOWPROX S 952 +16
    71
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4971

    I FIT: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.8 = 55

    SNOWPROX S 952: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 54

    Treadwear

    SNOWPROX S 952 +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4671

    I FIT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 54

    SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 38

    Handling (owners)

    SNOWPROX S 952 +37
    75
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSNOWPROX S 952
    Reviews found online3875
Scores at a glance
Laufenn I FIT vs Toyo SNOWPROX S 952: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn I FITToyo SNOWPROX S 952
Relative Score 48 75
Dry 50 74
Wet 43 79
Snow 63 –
Comfort 55 71
Treadwear 54 69
Handling (owners) 38 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

I FIT

± 8

SNOWPROX S 952

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A I FIT

Pros

  • Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
  • Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand

Cons

  • Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
  • Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
  • Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
All owner themes in the I FIT review

Tire B SNOWPROX S 952

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence on snow and ice
  • Strong durability and slow tread wear
  • Excellent value for money

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, particularly at higher speeds
  • Potential for audible feedback during aggressive dry cornering
  • Inconsistent performance feedback for non-winter driving scenarios
All owner themes in the SNOWPROX S 952 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn I FIT B · Toyo SNOWPROX S 952
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters14″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn I FIT

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952

Winner: Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn I FIT rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 75 vs 38 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 79 vs 43 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 74 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 scores 71 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Laufenn I FIT
Tire B · Toyo SNOWPROX S 952

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?

Which is better in the wet, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 79 vs 43 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 74 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 71 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, I FIT or SNOWPROX S 952?

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology