Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn S fit EQ vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 31 road tests and 14 + 1,946 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 89–54

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire ALaufenn

S fit EQ

Summer

± 9

Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 54 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
± 4

Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,946 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +43
    94
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 30 tests4996
    Reviews found online5392

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.8 + 40% × 53.4 = 51

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.5 = 94

  2. 50

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +42
    92
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 31 tests4793
    Reviews found online5492

    S fit EQ: 60% × 47 + 40% × 53.6 = 50

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 93 + 40% × 91.6 = 92

  3. 58

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +21
    79
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 66 (est.)76
    Reviews found online5381

    S fit EQ: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.3 = 58

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for S fit EQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. 56

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +26
    82
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 26 tests4992
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 56

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 91.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 82

    No owner ratings of noise for S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 61

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +25
    86
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests6496
    Reviews found online5670

    S fit EQ: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 55.9 = 61

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86

  6. 46

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +44
    90
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Reviews found online4690
  7. 71

    Efficiency

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 26 tests7171
Scores at a glance
Laufenn S fit EQ vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn S fit EQGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Relative Score 54 89
Dry 51 94
Wet 50 92
Comfort 58 79
Noise 56 82
Treadwear 61 86
Handling (owners) 46 90
Efficiency 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

S fit EQ

± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryS fit EQEagle F1 Asymmetric 6ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 91% #35/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 95% #13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 89% #8/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% #9/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 98% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 77% #42/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 92% #7/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 92% #14/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test 100% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 77% #10/12 · 2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 89% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test 84% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/10 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 #8/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A S fit EQ

Pros

  • Attractive price point offering high value for money
  • Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
  • Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
  • Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
All owner themes in the S fit EQ review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Noticeably lower road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and progressive handling at the limit

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly squishy feel or floatiness during aggressive quick transitions
  • Some susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water at high speeds
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Laufenn S fit EQ

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Positive

The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.

Top themes
#Strong dry grip#Michelin PS5 comparison#Comfort and ride harshness#Wear and durability#Cold-weather performance concerns#Value and pricing#BMW star OEM version#EV-ready and fitment questions

Based on 29 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn S fit EQ B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available24130
Rim diameters15″ – 20″17″ – 23″
Tread depth—7 - 9/32″
UTQG360 A A260 - 300 AA A
Treadwear warranty—30,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn S fit EQ

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 92 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 82 vs 56 on noise.

Tire A · Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Which is better in the wet, S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 82 vs 56 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, S fit EQ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology