Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 54 · 14 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S fit EQ vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 9 road tests and 14 + 1,373 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 80–54
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,373 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +3586Why this score
Source S fit EQ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 9 tests 49 86 Reviews found online 54 86 S fit EQ: 60% × 48.9 + 40% × 53.9 = 51
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86 + 40% × 86.4 = 86
-
49
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +4291Why this score
Source S fit EQ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 9 tests 46 94 Reviews found online 54 87 S fit EQ: 60% × 46 + 40% × 53.8 = 49
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 94 + 40% × 86.6 = 91
-
59
Comfort
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +564Why this score
Source S fit EQ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 54 Reviews found online 54 71 S fit EQ: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54.2 + 60% × 71.1 = 64
No road tests of comfort for S fit EQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Noise
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +258Why this score
Source S fit EQ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests 49 53 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) S fit EQ: 60% × 48.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 56
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 58
No owner ratings of noise for S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1172Why this score
Source S fit EQ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 64 77 Reviews found online 56 65 S fit EQ: 60% × 64 + 40% × 55.7 = 61
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 72
-
47
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +3683Why this score
Source S fit EQ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Reviews found online 47 83 -
71
Efficiency
S fit EQ +764Why this score
Source S fit EQ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests 71 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S fit EQ | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 80 |
| Dry | 51 | 86 |
| Wet | 49 | 91 |
| Comfort | 59 | 64 |
| Noise | 56 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 83 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
54
/ 100
S fit EQ
80
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | S fit EQ | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #35/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 95% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 89% #8/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 92% #9/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 77% #42/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 95% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 92% #14/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 77% #10/12 · 2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | 97% #2/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 89% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 86% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/10 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 | #5/9 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S fit EQ
Pros
- Attractive price point offering high value for money
- Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
- Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
- Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
- Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
Tire B Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Pros
- Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
- Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling
Cons
- Higher-than-average purchase price
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
- Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn S fit EQ
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.
r/PorscheMacan
·1 upvote ·2026-04-04
“I'm leaning towards the Pilot Sport 4 SUV over the LS3. I'd really like to see how much better these tires grip. Although it sounds like I'll be sacrificing a little comfort, but with air suspension I'm not too worried.”
r/Audi
·1 upvote ·2026-07-09
“Nope nope nope. I live in the SE and my RWD sports car get squirrelly with normal driving when it drops below 40 on my PS4Ss. You’d be in a ditch first bit of snow.”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2022-02-01
“From 3 model you mention, only Alenza is designed for heavy vehicle/SUV, so longevity is better than other 2 for your Envoy even though the traction may not be the best. If you can find Pilot Sport 4 SUV, then it may be the best to replace Latitude Sport 3. I like Latitude Sport 3, the best in wet weather and great in dry, but it is true it is only 25000 miles lifetime.”
Top themes
#Summer temperature limitations#Grip and handling performance#Tread life and wear#Comparison with Latitude Sport 3#Ride comfort and firmness#SUV-specific load design
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S fit EQ | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 24 | 65 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 23″ |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
54
/ 100
Laufenn S fit EQ
80
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if efficiency matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 49 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 51 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 61 on treadwear.
Tire A · Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 49 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 51 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 58 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 64 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, S fit EQ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Laufenn S fit EQ, 71 vs 64 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology