Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 54 · 14 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S fit EQ vs Pirelli Powergy — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 1 road tests and 14 + 1,813 owner reviews. How we score
Powergy is ahead, 68–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 1 test Owners 60 · 1,813 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
Powergy +2071Why this score
Source S fit EQ Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests 49 77 Reviews found online 53 62 S fit EQ: 60% × 48.8 + 40% × 53.4 = 51
Powergy: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 62 = 71
-
50
Wet
Powergy +2171Why this score
Source S fit EQ Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests 47 76 Reviews found online 54 65 S fit EQ: 60% × 46.9 + 40% × 53.6 = 50
Powergy: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 64.9 = 71
-
58
Comfort
Powergy +563Why this score
Source S fit EQ Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 53 56 S fit EQ: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.4 = 58
Powergy: 40% × 73.6 + 60% × 55.9 = 63
No road tests of comfort for S fit EQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
56
Noise
Powergy +1874Why this score
Source S fit EQ Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 49 79 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) S fit EQ: 60% × 48.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 56
Powergy: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
No owner ratings of noise for S fit EQ or Powergy. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
S fit EQ +358Why this score
Source S fit EQ Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 64 ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 56 52 S fit EQ: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 56 = 61
Powergy: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Powergy +1662Why this score
Source S fit EQ Powergy Reviews found online 46 62 -
71
Efficiency
Powergy +374Why this score
Source S fit EQ Powergy Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 71 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S fit EQ | Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 68 |
| Dry | 51 | 71 |
| Wet | 50 | 71 |
| Comfort | 58 | 63 |
| Noise | 56 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 62 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
S fit EQ
68
/ 100
Powergy
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | S fit EQ | Powergy | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #35/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 94% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 92% #9/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 92% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 77% #42/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 96% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 97% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 92% #14/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 89% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 81% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/10 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 | #5/10 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S fit EQ
Pros
- Attractive price point offering high value for money
- Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
- Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
- Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
- Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
Tire B Powergy
Pros
- Significantly reduced road noise and quiet highway ride
- Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality compared to run-flats
Cons
- Faster than average tread wear or shallow initial tread depth
- Negative impact on fuel economy (MPG) for some users
- Soft sidewalls leading to muted steering feedback and less precise handling at the limit
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn S fit EQ
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Pirelli Powergy
Community opinion on the Pirelli Powergy is largely mixed, with the tire frequently viewed as an eco/budget, mid-tier option suitable for daily driving rather than high-performance use. While some users consider it a cost-effective, fuel-efficient choice from a reputable brand, others report negative experiences including excessive highway vibrations and potential sidewall defects. A significant number of discussions also revolve around general inquiries regarding safety, longevity, and whether it can be mixed with other Pirelli models.
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-05-18
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
r/mazda3
·1 upvote ·2026-10-05
“Avg 29mpg on a 2015 Mazda 3 Sport Nav 2L 165bhp, any ideas? I've had this car for about 3-4 weeks now, posted it here on this subreddit too. So far, I've done about 800 miles and my average fuel consumtion seems to be around 29mpg - 10.2L/100km. The car doesn't have its original rims, its on **MAM RS3** 18" rims with Pirelli Powergy tires 215/45/R18 (internet says these tires provide good fuel economy). On longer trips the average is about 40mpg-45mpg which still seems a bit high. My work commute is about 2 miles, and I do occasionally drive in a spirited manner. Is this okay? Thank you all!”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2026-08-31
“Ripples in side wall Just been washing the car and found what I can only describe as ripples in the side wall of my front-right tyre. Had these fitted in June, only just noticed the ripples. The other tyres are perfect. I’ve probably done around 2,000 miles on them. Should I be concerned, and do they look like a manufacturing defect, or as a result of damage? (I’ve not hit any serious potholes that I’m aware of). These tyres are Pirelli Powergy, fitted to a Volvo XC60. Date code is 3325. Any help gratefully received. Read more”
Top themes
#budget eco tire line#highway vibrations and comfort#sidewall damage and defects#mixing with other tires#daily driver suitability#fuel economy and mileage
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S fit EQ | B · Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 24 | 87 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| UTQG | 360 A A | — |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Laufenn S fit EQ
68
/ 100
Pirelli Powergy
Winner: Pirelli Powergy — better wet, dry and noise. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli Powergy scores 71 vs 50 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Pirelli Powergy scores 71 vs 51 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Pirelli Powergy scores 74 vs 56 on noise.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Pirelli Powergy scores 62 vs 46 on handling.
Tire A · Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire B · Pirelli Powergy
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
S fit EQ or Powergy?
Which is better in the wet, S fit EQ or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 71 vs 50 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, S fit EQ or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 71 vs 51 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, S fit EQ or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 74 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, S fit EQ or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, S fit EQ or Powergy?
Laufenn S fit EQ, 61 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, S fit EQ or Powergy?
Pirelli Powergy, 74 vs 71 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology