tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn S fit EQ vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 4 + 0 road tests and 14 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 72–54

Check price on Amazon · Proxes ST or S fit EQ on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire ALaufenn

S fit EQ

Summer

Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 56 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    Proxes ST +21
    72
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests49≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5475

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.9 + 40% × 54.1 = 51

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 50

    Wet

    Proxes ST +25
    75
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests46≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online5677

    S fit EQ: 60% × 46 + 40% × 56.1 = 50

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–64

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5674

    S fit EQ: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 63

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for S fit EQ or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 56

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests49–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 56

    No owner ratings of noise for S fit EQ. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests64≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5972

    S fit EQ: 60% × 64 + 40% × 59.1 = 62

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +22
    71
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQProxes ST
    Reviews found online4971
Scores at a glance
CategoryLaufenn S fit EQToyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 54 72
Dry 51 72
Wet 50 75
Snow – 66
Comfort 63 72
Noise 56 –
Treadwear 62 69
Handling (owners) 49 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

S fit EQ

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A S fit EQ

Pros

  • Attractive price point offering high value for money
  • Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
  • Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
  • Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
All owner themes in the S fit EQ review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn S fit EQ B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available241
Rim diameters15″ – 20″19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn S fit EQ

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Laufenn S fit EQ
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

S fit EQ or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, S fit EQ or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, S fit EQ or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, S fit EQ or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, S fit EQ or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology