Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn S fit EQ vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–54

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ALaufenn

S fit EQ

Summer

Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 55 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +18
    69
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)49–
    Reviews found online5470
  2. 50

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +22
    72
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)46–
    Reviews found online5673
  3. 63

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online5674
  4. 56

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)49–
  5. 62

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)64–
    Reviews found online5965
  6. 49

    Handling

    BluEarth Es ES32 +24
    73
    Why this score
    SourceS fit EQBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online4973
Scores at a glance
Laufenn S fit EQ vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn S fit EQYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 54 70
Dry 51 69
Wet 50 72
Comfort 63 72
Noise 56 –
Treadwear 62 65
Handling 49 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

S fit EQ

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A S fit EQ

Pros

  • Attractive price point offering high value for money
  • Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
  • Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
  • Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
All owner themes in the S fit EQ review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn S fit EQ B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2464
Rim diameters15″ – 20″13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn S fit EQ

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

BluEarth Es ES32

Amazon