Head-to-head Updated

Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 7 + 80 owner reviews. How we score

N Fera SU4 is ahead, 78–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Mabor Sport Jet 3
Tire AMabor

Sport Jet 3

Summer

± 8

Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 73 · 7 reviews

Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU4

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 80 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    N Fera SU4 +11
    79
    Why this score
    SourceSport Jet 3N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests65≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online7285

    Sport Jet 3: 60% × 65.5 + 40% × 72 = 68

    N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 79

    No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    N Fera SU4 +11
    81
    Why this score
    SourceSport Jet 3N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67≈ 79 (est.)
    Reviews found online7485

    Sport Jet 3: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 73.9 = 70

    N Fera SU4: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.2 = 81

    No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    N Fera SU4 +8
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSport Jet 3N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6980

    Sport Jet 3: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 68.7 = 69

    N Fera SU4: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.1 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Sport Jet 3 or N Fera SU4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Treadwear

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSport Jet 3N Fera SU4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7474

    Sport Jet 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 71

    N Fera SU4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Sport Jet 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 73

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU4 +7
    80
    Why this score
    SourceSport Jet 3N Fera SU4
    Reviews found online7380
Scores at a glance
Mabor Sport Jet 3 vs Nexen N Fera SU4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMabor Sport Jet 3Nexen N Fera SU4
Relative Score 70 78
Dry 68 79
Wet 70 81
Comfort 69 77
Treadwear 71 71
Handling (owners) 73 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Sport Jet 3

± 8

N Fera SU4

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sport Jet 3

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point
  • Strong tread life and durability over high mileage
  • Reliable dry weather grip and handling

Cons

  • Reduced feedback and increased braking distances in wet conditions
  • Tendency to lose traction or 'slip' on very wet surfaces
  • Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving demands
All owner themes in the Sport Jet 3 review

Tire B N Fera SU4

Pros

  • Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
  • Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
  • Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
All owner themes in the N Fera SU4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Mabor Sport Jet 3 B · Nexen N Fera SU4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available59—
Rim diameters13″ – 19″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Mabor Sport Jet 3

Nexen N Fera SU4

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 79 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 81 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 69 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 80 vs 73 on handling.

Tire A · Mabor Sport Jet 3
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sport Jet 3 or N Fera SU4?

Which is better in the wet, Sport Jet 3 or N Fera SU4?

Nexen N Fera SU4, 81 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Jet 3 or N Fera SU4?

Nexen N Fera SU4, 79 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Sport Jet 3 or N Fera SU4?

Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Sport Jet 3 or N Fera SU4?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology