Tests – · none yet Owners 84 · 8 reviews
Michelin Anakee 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin City Grip 2 vs Michelin Anakee 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
City Grip 2 is ahead, 80–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
City Grip 2 +1565Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 87 63 City Grip 2: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 86.8 = 80
Anakee 3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 65
No road tests of dry for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
84
Wet
City Grip 2 +1965Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 81 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 89 62 City Grip 2: 60% × 80.8 (est.) + 40% × 89.2 = 84
Anakee 3: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65
No road tests of wet for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Comfort
City Grip 2 +1362Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 79 58 City Grip 2: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 75
Anakee 3: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62
No road tests of comfort for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
74
Treadwear
City Grip 2 +1064Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 78 63 City Grip 2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 74
Anakee 3: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
86
Handling (owners)
City Grip 2 +2264Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Anakee 3 Reviews found online 86 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin City Grip 2 | Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 64 |
| Dry | 80 | 65 |
| Wet | 84 | 65 |
| Comfort | 75 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
City Grip 2
Anakee 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A City Grip 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Improved confidence and stability when cornering and leaning
- Solid mileage and tread longevity
Cons
- Slightly stiffer construction can reduce impact absorption or comfort on rough roads for certain riders
- Transmits noticeable road feedback and creases
- Requires a brief warm-up period of around 5 minutes to reach maximum stickiness
Tire B Anakee 3
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Reliable performance for long-distance touring
- Solid construction quality associated with the Michelin brand
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Unpredictable or 'scary' handling in wet conditions
- Lack of feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in certain scenarios
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin City Grip 2 | B · Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin City Grip 2
Michelin Anakee 3
Winner: Michelin City Grip 2 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin City Grip 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Anakee 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 86 vs 64 on handling.
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 84 vs 65 on wet.
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 80 vs 65 on dry.
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 75 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
City Grip 2 or Anakee 3?
Which is better in the wet, City Grip 2 or Anakee 3?
Michelin City Grip 2, 84 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, City Grip 2 or Anakee 3?
Michelin City Grip 2, 80 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, City Grip 2 or Anakee 3?
Michelin City Grip 2, 75 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, City Grip 2 or Anakee 3?
Michelin City Grip 2, 74 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology