Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 79 · 24 reviews
Michelin Anakee 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Road 5 vs Michelin Anakee 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 24 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Road 5 is ahead, 75–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Road 5 +765Why this score
Source Road 5 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 78 63 Road 5: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 78.2 = 72
Anakee 3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 65
No road tests of dry for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
Road 5 +1565Why this score
Source Road 5 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 83 62 Road 5: 60% × 77.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 80
Anakee 3: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65
No road tests of wet for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
76
Comfort
Road 5 +1462Why this score
Source Road 5 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 79 58 Road 5: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.2 = 76
Anakee 3: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
72
Treadwear
Road 5 +864Why this score
Source Road 5 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 75 63 Road 5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
Anakee 3: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Road 5 +1364Why this score
Source Road 5 Anakee 3 Reviews found online 77 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Road 5 | Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 64 |
| Dry | 72 | 65 |
| Wet | 80 | 65 |
| Comfort | 76 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Road 5
Anakee 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Road 5
Pros
- Class-leading wet weather grip and rider confidence
- Excellent tread life and durability for touring applications
- Dual-compound construction provides a balance of stability and cornering grip
Cons
- High susceptibility to punctures from road debris
- Soft carcass construction can be prone to structural damage from impacts
- Some users report a lack of feedback compared to dedicated sport tires
Tire B Anakee 3
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Reliable performance for long-distance touring
- Solid construction quality associated with the Michelin brand
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Unpredictable or 'scary' handling in wet conditions
- Lack of feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in certain scenarios
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Road 5 | B · Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Road 5
Michelin Anakee 3
Winner: Michelin Road 5 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Anakee 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Road 5 scores 80 vs 65 on wet.
Michelin Road 5 scores 76 vs 62 on comfort.
Michelin Road 5 scores 77 vs 64 on handling.
Michelin Road 5 scores 72 vs 64 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Road 5 or Anakee 3?
Which is better in the wet, Road 5 or Anakee 3?
Michelin Road 5, 80 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Road 5 or Anakee 3?
Michelin Road 5, 72 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Road 5 or Anakee 3?
Michelin Road 5, 76 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Road 5 or Anakee 3?
Michelin Road 5, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology