Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 76 · 1 review
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Michelin Anakee 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiRoadAttack 3 is ahead, 74–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ContiRoadAttack 3 +1363Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) 73 – Reviews found online 80 61 -
78
Wet
ContiRoadAttack 3 +1662Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Anakee 3 Reviews found online 81 59 -
70
Comfort
ContiRoadAttack 3 +664Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Anakee 3 Reviews found online 71 58 -
65
Treadwear
ContiRoadAttack 3 +263Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Anakee 3 Reviews found online 65 62 -
79
Handling
ContiRoadAttack 3 +1762Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Anakee 3 Reviews found online 79 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 | Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 63 |
| Dry | 76 | 63 |
| Wet | 78 | 62 |
| Comfort | 70 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 63 |
| Handling | 79 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiRoadAttack 3
Anakee 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
- High level of rider confidence
- Well-suited for sport-touring applications
Cons
- Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
- Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
Tire B Anakee 3
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Reliable performance for long-distance touring
- Solid construction quality associated with the Michelin brand
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Unpredictable or 'scary' handling in wet conditions
- Lack of feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in certain scenarios
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 | B · Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Michelin Anakee 3
Winner: Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 79 vs 62 on handling.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 78 vs 62 on wet.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 76 vs 63 on dry.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.