tirewheelguide

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Michelin Anakee 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Michelin Anakee 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

ContiRoadAttack 3 is ahead, 71–64

Check price on Amazon · ContiRoadAttack 3 or Anakee 3 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Tire AContinental

ContiRoadAttack 3

Summer

± 7Provisional

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 70 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)

Michelin Anakee 3
Tire BMichelin

Anakee 3

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Anakee 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7263

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73

    Anakee 3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Anakee 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7562

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Anakee 3: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65

    No road tests of wet for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Anakee 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6658

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Anakee 3: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Anakee 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6463

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Anakee 3: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Anakee 3
    Reviews found online7164
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiRoadAttack 3Michelin Anakee 3
Relative Score 71 64
Dry 73 65
Wet 74 65
Comfort 67 62
Treadwear 65 64
Handling (owners) 71 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiRoadAttack 3

± 8

Anakee 3

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiRoadAttack 3

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
  • High level of rider confidence
  • Well-suited for sport-touring applications

Cons

  • Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
  • Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
All owner themes in the ContiRoadAttack 3 review

Tire B Anakee 3

Pros

  • Impressive tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable performance for long-distance touring
  • Solid construction quality associated with the Michelin brand

Cons

  • High levels of road noise
  • Unpredictable or 'scary' handling in wet conditions
  • Lack of feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in certain scenarios
All owner themes in the Anakee 3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 B · Michelin Anakee 3
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3

Michelin Anakee 3

Winner: Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Anakee 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 74 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Anakee 3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiRoadAttack 3 or Anakee 3?

Which is better in the wet, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Anakee 3?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3, 74 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Anakee 3?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Anakee 3?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Anakee 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology