Tests 47 · 1 test Owners 71 · 9 reviews
Michelin Anakee 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 vs Michelin Anakee 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Battlax Sport Touring T32 leads, 66–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +565Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 63 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
Anakee 3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 65
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
Anakee 3 +565Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 47 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 78 62 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 47.5 + 40% × 78.3 = 60
Anakee 3: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65
No road tests of wet for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +1162Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 58 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
Anakee 3: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Level64Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Anakee 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 63 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Anakee 3: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Anakee 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +1164Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Anakee 3 Reviews found online 75 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 64 |
| Dry | 70 | 65 |
| Wet | 60 | 65 |
| Comfort | 73 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax Sport Touring T32
Anakee 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and heavy rain confidence
- High-speed stability, including at autobahn speeds with full luggage
- Immediate improvement in handling agility and steering feel compared to competitors or older tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and relatively low mileage lifespan
- Rear tire can slip or slide when pushed hard in dry, warm conditions
- Reduced performance feel after a few thousand miles of use
Tire B Anakee 3
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Reliable performance for long-distance touring
- Solid construction quality associated with the Michelin brand
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Unpredictable or 'scary' handling in wet conditions
- Lack of feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in certain scenarios
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | B · Michelin Anakee 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Michelin Anakee 3
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Anakee 3 if wet matters most to you. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Anakee 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 73 vs 62 on comfort.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 75 vs 64 on handling.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 70 vs 65 on dry.
Michelin Anakee 3 scores 65 vs 60 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Anakee 3?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Anakee 3?
Michelin Anakee 3, 65 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Anakee 3?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32, 70 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Anakee 3?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32, 73 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Anakee 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology