Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 152 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate is ahead, 74–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate

All Season

± 5

Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 152 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    CrossClimate +23
    53
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests78≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7445

    CrossClimate: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 73.9 = 76

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 76

    Wet

    CrossClimate +25
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7844

    CrossClimate: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 78 = 76

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51

    No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    CrossClimate +15
    54
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6644

    CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 65.6 = 69

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    CrossClimate +21
    53
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7646

    CrossClimate: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 76.3 = 74

    Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.7 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for CrossClimate or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    CrossClimate: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate +21
    53
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7545

    CrossClimate: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate +27
    46
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Reviews found online7346
  8. 76

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimateEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76–
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimateMichelin Energy Saver A/S
Relative Score 74 52
Dry 76 53
Wet 76 51
Snow 69 54
Comfort 74 53
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 74 53
Handling (owners) 73 46
Efficiency 76 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

CrossClimate

± 8

Energy Saver A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
  • Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
  • Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the CrossClimate review

Tire B Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate scores 73 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate scores 74 vs 53 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate or Energy Saver A/S?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate or Energy Saver A/S?

Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate or Energy Saver A/S?

Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate or Energy Saver A/S?

Michelin CrossClimate, 69 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate or Energy Saver A/S?

Michelin CrossClimate, 74 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate or Energy Saver A/S?

Michelin CrossClimate, 74 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology