Michelin Energy E3A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 33 + 0 road tests and 21,761 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,761 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“We downsized from 21” stock on GTline to 20” rims and put on the CC2s—can’t stand the ugly stock rims and plastic covers. It got so much quieter that we noticed we could turn the radio down from 6 to 4 on the secondary roads, and down from 8 to 5 on the highway. Efficiency improved slightly, possibly due to lighter weight wheels.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / – tests | 99 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 66 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95
Energy E3A: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66
No road tests of dry for Energy E3A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 59 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
Energy E3A: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62
No road tests of wet for Energy E3A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests | 99 | – |
| Reviews found online | 79 | – |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.7 = 91
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 67 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 63 |
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.1 + 60% × 86.1 = 79
Energy E3A: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Energy E3A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests | 77 | – |
| Reviews found online | 83 | – |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.5 = 79
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 81 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 71 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
Energy E3A: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Energy E3A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 82 | 64 |
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests | 90 | – |
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | Michelin Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 65 |
| Dry | 95 | 66 |
| Wet | 87 | 62 |
| Snow | 91 | – |
| Comfort | 79 | 64 |
| Noise | 79 | – |
| Treadwear | 84 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 64 |
| Efficiency | 90 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossClimate 2
Energy E3A
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”
“I live in Vancouver,WA and the CC2 are great for our climate even the light snowfall. I have an SR+, so they’re the 18” version. I have about 22K miles on them after 2 years and have averaged 240Wh/mi since installation, and I don’t drive conservatively. They did increase power usage by about 15-20Wh/mi. I’ve also been lazy and haven’t rotated them and they still are wearing very well. Got about 8/32nd up front and 6/32 in rear. Much better than the stock tires that were almost worn out at 22K. Note that places like Costco will not install these on your Tesla because they don’t meet the factory speed rating. It’s a CYA thing.”
“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
Based on 762 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 | B · Michelin Energy E3A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 92 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 B A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Michelin Energy E3A
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy E3A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 66 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 87 vs 62 on wet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 64 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 79 vs 64 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 62 on our wet score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 66 on our dry score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
