Toyo Proxes 4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 32 + 0 road tests and 21,725 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–61
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 87 · 21,725 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 45 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests | 99 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 59 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.3 + 40% × 88.3 = 95
Proxes 4: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62
No road tests of dry for Proxes 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 91 | 57 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 91.2 = 86
Proxes 4: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 60
No road tests of wet for Proxes 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests | 99 | – |
| Reviews found online | 78 | – |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.3 = 90
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 64 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 58 |
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 64 + 60% × 86.1 = 77
Proxes 4: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Proxes 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests | 78 | – |
| Reviews found online | 83 | – |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 82.8 = 80
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 81 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 63 |
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
Proxes 4: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 82 | 55 |
| Source | CrossClimate 2 | Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests | 90 | – |
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate 2 | Toyo Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 61 |
| Dry | 95 | 62 |
| Wet | 86 | 60 |
| Snow | 90 | – |
| Comfort | 77 | 62 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 84 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 82 | 55 |
| Efficiency | 90 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossClimate 2
Proxes 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”
“We downsized from 21” stock on GTline to 20” rims and put on the CC2s—can’t stand the ugly stock rims and plastic covers. It got so much quieter that we noticed we could turn the radio down from 6 to 4 on the secondary roads, and down from 8 to 5 on the highway. Efficiency improved slightly, possibly due to lighter weight wheels.”
“I live in Vancouver,WA and the CC2 are great for our climate even the light snowfall. I have an SR+, so they’re the 18” version. I have about 22K miles on them after 2 years and have averaged 240Wh/mi since installation, and I don’t drive conservatively. They did increase power usage by about 15-20Wh/mi. I’ve also been lazy and haven’t rotated them and they still are wearing very well. Got about 8/32nd up front and 6/32 in rear. Much better than the stock tires that were almost worn out at 22K. Note that places like Costco will not install these on your Tesla because they don’t meet the factory speed rating. It’s a CYA thing.”
Based on 762 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 | B · Toyo Proxes 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 92 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 B A | 300 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Toyo Proxes 4
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 62 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 55 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 86 vs 60 on wet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 64 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 86 vs 60 on our wet score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 62 on our dry score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 77 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
