Tests – · 1 test Owners 78 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 10 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 76–66
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 78 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 79 |
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 76
Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 76 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 61 |
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 78
Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 34 |
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 66 |
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 73
Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 70 |
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70
Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for Defender LTX M/S or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 74 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 68 |
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 78 = 76
Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 79 | 73 |
| Category | Michelin Defender LTX M/S | Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 66 |
| Dry | 76 | 75 |
| Wet | 78 | 64 |
| Snow | 72 | 49 |
| Comfort | 73 | 67 |
| Noise | 70 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Defender LTX M/S
Proxes RA1
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S | B · Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 100 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Toyo Proxes RA1
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better snow, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 72 vs 49 on snow.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 78 vs 64 on wet.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 76 vs 67 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 64 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 72 vs 49 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 76 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology