Tests – · 1 test Owners 78 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Yokohama Advan S4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs Yokohama Advan S4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 10 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 77–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +2452Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 81 43 Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 76
Advan S4: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 52
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
78
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +3444Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 81 35 Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 78
Advan S4: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
72
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
73
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +1954Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 76 40 Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 73
Advan S4: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Defender LTX M/S or Advan S4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 75 – Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70
No road tests of noise for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
76
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +1264Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Advan S4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 74 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 78 62 Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 78 = 76
Advan S4: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
79
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +3247Why this score
Source Defender LTX M/S Advan S4 Reviews found online 79 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Defender LTX M/S | Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 51 |
| Dry | 76 | 52 |
| Wet | 78 | 44 |
| Snow | 72 | – |
| Comfort | 73 | 54 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 76 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Defender LTX M/S
51
/ 100
Advan S4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage lifespan
- Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
- Strong year-round traction across dry, wet, and light snow conditions
Cons
- High upfront purchase price
- Subpar performance in deep mud, sand, and off-road environments
- Limited ice and severe winter capability compared to dedicated winter tires
Tire B Advan S4
Pros
- Acceptable handling characteristics at very low city speeds
- Responsiveness can be marginally improved by adjusting tire pressure
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Significant lack of performance in snow and winter environments
- Noticeable understeer and sluggish turn-in response
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S | B · Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
51
/ 100
Yokohama Advan S4
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Advan S4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 78 vs 44 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 76 vs 52 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 73 vs 54 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire B · Yokohama Advan S4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Defender LTX M/S or Advan S4?
Which is better in the wet, Defender LTX M/S or Advan S4?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 78 vs 44 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Defender LTX M/S or Advan S4?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 76 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Defender LTX M/S or Advan S4?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 73 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Defender LTX M/S or Advan S4?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 76 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology