Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Defender T+H vs Kumho Solus TA11 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 59 owner reviews. How we score

Defender T+H leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Defender T+H
Tire AMichelin

Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Kumho Solus TA11
Tire BKumho

Solus TA11

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 59 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Defender T+H +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HSolus TA11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7063

    Defender T+H: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Defender T+H +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HSolus TA11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7370

    Defender T+H: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72

    Solus TA11: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Defender T+H +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HSolus TA11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6152

    Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    Solus TA11: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Defender T+H +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HSolus TA11
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6664

    Defender T+H: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67

    Solus TA11: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.3 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H or Solus TA11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HSolus TA11
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–69

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Defender T+H +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDefender T+HSolus TA11
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6868

    Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 67.9 = 73

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

Scores at a glance
Michelin Defender T+H vs Kumho Solus TA11: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Defender T+HKumho Solus TA11
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 69 65
Wet 72 70
Snow 65 60
Comfort 67 66
Noise – 68
Treadwear 73 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Defender T+H

± 8

Solus TA11

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Solus TA11

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Reliable traction in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Lack of rigidity or grip for aggressive driving
  • Subpar performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise depending on the vehicle or surface
All owner themes in the Solus TA11 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Defender T+H B · Kumho Solus TA11
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tirePremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—18
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG820 A - B B700 A B
Treadwear warranty—75,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Defender T+H

Kumho Solus TA11

Narrow edge: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Defender T+H scores 65 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender T+H scores 69 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA11

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Defender T+H or Solus TA11?

Which is better in the wet, Defender T+H or Solus TA11?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Defender T+H or Solus TA11?

Michelin Defender T+H, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Defender T+H or Solus TA11?

Michelin Defender T+H, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Defender T+H or Solus TA11?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Defender T+H or Solus TA11?

Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology