Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Defender T+H leads, 70–67 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 9 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Defender T+H | Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 69 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70
Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Defender T+H | Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 69 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73
Latitude Tour: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Defender T+H | Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 64 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65
Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Defender T+H | Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 61 |
Defender T+H: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
Latitude Tour: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H or Latitude Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Defender T+H | Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 63 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68 = 73
Latitude Tour: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Defender T+H | Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | – | 57 |
| Category | Michelin Defender T+H | Michelin Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 67 |
| Dry | 70 | 68 |
| Wet | 73 | 69 |
| Snow | 65 | 66 |
| Comfort | 68 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Defender T+H
Latitude Tour
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender T+H | B · Michelin Latitude Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Michelin Defender T+H
Michelin Latitude Tour
Narrow edge: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Where the Michelin Latitude Tour is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Latitude Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 68 vs 63 on comfort.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Michelin Defender T+H, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology