Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Latitude Tour vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude TourDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6877

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +8
    77
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude TourDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online6880

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude TourDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6367

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude TourDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6077

    Latitude Tour: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude TourDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude TourDynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6377

    Latitude Tour: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP2 RA33 +17
    74
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude TourDynapro HP2 RA33
    Reviews found online5774
Scores at a glance
Michelin Latitude Tour vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Latitude TourHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Relative Score 66 74
Dry 68 74
Wet 69 77
Snow 66 68
Comfort 63 75
Noise – 70
Treadwear 64 73
Handling (owners) 57 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Latitude Tour

± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Latitude Tour

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Very low road noise levels
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Stiff ride characteristics, particularly in colder temperatures
  • Inconsistent tread wear patterns, including premature flaking
  • Limited performance in true winter conditions despite M+S rating
All owner themes in the Latitude Tour review

Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Tour B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available149
Rim diameters17″15″ – 22″
UTQG600 - 720 A B—
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Latitude Tour

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Latitude Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Tour
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Which is better in the wet, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology