Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 9 reviews
Michelin Latitude Tour vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 67 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP2 RA33 is ahead, 74–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 67 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +674Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 68 77 Latitude Tour: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +877Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 68 80 Latitude Tour: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77
No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +268Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 67 Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
63
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1275Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 60 77 Latitude Tour: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +973Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 77 Latitude Tour: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +1774Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Dynapro HP2 RA33 Reviews found online 57 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Tour | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 74 |
| Dry | 68 | 74 |
| Wet | 69 | 77 |
| Snow | 66 | 68 |
| Comfort | 63 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Latitude Tour
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Latitude Tour
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Very low road noise levels
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Stiff ride characteristics, particularly in colder temperatures
- Inconsistent tread wear patterns, including premature flaking
- Limited performance in true winter conditions despite M+S rating
Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Tour | B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| UTQG | 600 - 720 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Latitude Tour
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Latitude Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 74 vs 57 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 75 vs 63 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Which is better in the wet, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 77 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 75 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Latitude Tour or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33, 73 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology