Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Defender T+H is ahead, 71–66
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Defender T+H | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 79 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Defender T+H | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 61 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Defender T+H | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 34 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Defender T+H | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 66 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Defender T+H | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 70 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69
Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for Defender T+H or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Defender T+H | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 75 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 68 |
Defender T+H: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 70 = 73
Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Defender T+H | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 73 |
| Category | Michelin Defender T+H | Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 66 |
| Dry | 72 | 75 |
| Wet | 74 | 64 |
| Snow | 66 | 49 |
| Comfort | 70 | 67 |
| Noise | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Defender T+H
Proxes RA1
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender T+H | B · Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 100 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Michelin Defender T+H
Toyo Proxes RA1
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes RA1 if dry matters most to you. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 66 vs 49 on snow.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 74 vs 64 on wet.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 67 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Defender T+H, 74 vs 64 on our wet score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Michelin Defender T+H, 66 vs 49 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Michelin Defender T+H, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology