Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews
Michelin Energy E3A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy E3A vs Toyo Proxes CF2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 110 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF2 is ahead, 72–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 76 · 110 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Proxes CF2 +471Why this score
Source Energy E3A Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 66 77 Energy E3A: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
Proxes CF2: 60% × 67 + 40% × 77.2 = 71
No road tests of dry for Energy E3A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
Proxes CF2 +1173Why this score
Source Energy E3A Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 59 77 Energy E3A: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 77.2 = 73
No road tests of wet for Energy E3A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
67
Comfort
Proxes CF2 +572Why this score
Source Energy E3A Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 64 76 Energy E3A: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 67
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Energy E3A or Proxes CF2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Proxes CF2 +270Why this score
Source Energy E3A Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 69 72 Energy E3A: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 68
Proxes CF2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Energy E3A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF2 +1377Why this score
Source Energy E3A Proxes CF2 Reviews found online 64 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy E3A | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 72 |
| Dry | 67 | 71 |
| Wet | 62 | 73 |
| Comfort | 67 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Energy E3A
72
/ 100
Proxes CF2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy E3A
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Low road noise and high comfort levels
- Improved fuel economy
Cons
- Audible squealing during cornering in warm weather
- Performance degradation as the tire ages
- Limited grip in heavy snow or icy conditions
Tire B Proxes CF2
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry grip with predictable handling
Cons
- Reports of rubber hardening or cracking after 2-3 years in hot climates
- Soft sidewalls can feel less precise during aggressive cornering
- Requires a significant 'scrub-in' period to reach peak grip levels
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy E3A | B · Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 55 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Michelin Energy E3A
72
/ 100
Toyo Proxes CF2
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy E3A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 77 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 73 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 71 vs 67 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy E3A
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy E3A or Proxes CF2?
Which is better in the wet, Energy E3A or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 73 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy E3A or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy E3A or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy E3A or Proxes CF2?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology