Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy EV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 5 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–49
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +2879Why this score
Source Energy EV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 42 73 Energy EV: 60% × 57.2 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 51
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79
No road tests of dry for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
54
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +2377Why this score
Source Energy EV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 48 75 Energy EV: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 54
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77
No road tests of wet for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
49
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +1968Why this score
Source Energy EV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 39 67 Energy EV: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 39.1 = 49
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Energy EV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 58 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
41
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +3374Why this score
Source Energy EV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 52 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 25 67 Energy EV: 60% × 51.7 (est.) + 40% × 25 = 41
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
42
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +3072Why this score
Source Energy EV Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 42 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison84Why this score
Source Energy EV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy EV | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 49 | 76 |
| Dry | 51 | 79 |
| Wet | 54 | 77 |
| Comfort | 49 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 41 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
49
/ 100
Energy EV
76
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy EV
Pros
- Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
- Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
- Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design
Cons
- High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
- Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
- Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin Energy EV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/AutomobileRO
·2 upvotes ·2025-03-23
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·3 upvotes ·2024-10-08
“Tried it out on 205/55R16 Grip wise, feels like similar grip level as previous Tyres. Quite good on dry, quick lane switch wun feel the Tyre wall lembeh over. Dry brake is good. Haven't test wet perf much yet. Noise, is abit similar to previous Tyre, maybe just slightly noiser. Comfort wise, is on the comfy side. FC wise, slightly worse than previous Tyre. Good replacement for economic call I feel from price per overall offering perspective Those who want a comfy n quiet ride, can consider this Tyre”
r/TireQuestions
·1 upvote ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy EV | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 1 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A A |
Which one should you actually buy?
49
/ 100
Michelin Energy EV
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy EV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 41 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 72 vs 42 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 51 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 54 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Energy EV
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 51 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 68 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 41 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology