Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Energy EV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 5 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 77–50

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Energy EV
Tire AMichelin

Energy EV

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 40 · 5 reviews

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 73 · 2,504 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +29
    80
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 57 (est.)84
    Reviews found online4276

    Energy EV: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 51

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 75.6 = 80

    No road tests of dry for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 55

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +23
    78
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 59 (est.)80
    Reviews found online5076

    Energy EV: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 55

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 79.8 + 40% × 76.2 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 4 +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4171

    Energy EV: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 55

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Energy EV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–58
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 42

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +31
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 53 (est.)76
    Reviews found online2569

    Energy EV: 60% × 53.1 (est.) + 40% × 25 = 42

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 69 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 43

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +31
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVVentus Prime 4
    Reviews found online4374
Scores at a glance
Michelin Energy EV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Energy EVHankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 50 77
Dry 51 80
Wet 55 78
Comfort 55 70
Noise – 61
Treadwear 42 73
Handling (owners) 43 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Energy EV

Ventus Prime 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Energy EV

Pros

  • Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
  • Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
  • Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design

Cons

  • High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
  • Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
  • Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
All owner themes in the Energy EV review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Energy EV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Energy EV B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available166
Rim diameters16″15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Energy EV

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy EV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 73 vs 42 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 55 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Energy EV
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 78 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 70 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Energy EV or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 73 vs 42 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology