Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Michelin Energy EV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 18 + 0 road tests and 3,596 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 83–50

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 85 · 18 tests Owners 77 · 3,596 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”

Michelin Energy EV
Tire BMichelin

Energy EV

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 40 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 84

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +33
    51
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Energy EV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests85≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online8342

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 83 = 84

    Energy EV: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 51

    No road tests of dry for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 87

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +32
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Energy EV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests91≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8250

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 91.2 + 40% × 81.6 = 87

    Energy EV: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 85

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +30
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Energy EV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests93≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7341

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 93.2 + 40% × 73.2 = 85

    Energy EV: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Energy EV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Energy EV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online67–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 67.4 = 71

  5. 76

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +34
    42
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Energy EV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests80≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online7025

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 70 = 76

    Energy EV: 60% × 53.1 (est.) + 40% × 25 = 42

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +38
    43
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Energy EV
    Reviews found online8143
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Michelin Energy EV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5Michelin Energy EV
Relative Score 83 50
Dry 84 51
Wet 87 55
Comfort 85 55
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 76 42
Handling (owners) 81 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Energy EV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Precise steering response and high-speed stability
  • Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
  • Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 review

Tire B Energy EV

Pros

  • Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
  • Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
  • Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design

Cons

  • High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
  • Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
  • Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
All owner themes in the Energy EV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Positive

Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing

Based on 13 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Energy EV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 B · Michelin Energy EV
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available641
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″
Tread depth7 - 9/32″—
UTQG300 - 500 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Michelin Energy EV

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy EV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 81 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 76 vs 42 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 84 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 87 vs 55 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Michelin Energy EV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Energy EV?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Energy EV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 87 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Energy EV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 84 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Energy EV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 85 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Energy EV?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 76 vs 42 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology