Tests – · none yet Owners 40 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy EV vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Energy Saver A/S is ahead, 55–50
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
Energy Saver A/S +556Why this score
Source Energy EV Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 42 49 Energy EV: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 51
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
No road tests of dry for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
55
Wet
Energy EV +154Why this score
Source Energy EV Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 50 49 Energy EV: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 55
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 54
No road tests of wet for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison54Why this score
Source Energy EV Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 43 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
55
Comfort
Energy Saver A/S +560Why this score
Source Energy EV Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 41 50 Energy EV: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 55
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Energy EV or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Energy EV Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 53 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 61
No road tests of noise for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
42
Treadwear
Energy Saver A/S +1557Why this score
Source Energy EV Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 53 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 25 51 Energy EV: 60% × 53.1 (est.) + 40% × 25 = 42
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
43
Handling (owners)
Energy Saver A/S +750Why this score
Source Energy EV Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 43 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy EV | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 50 | 55 |
| Dry | 51 | 56 |
| Wet | 55 | 54 |
| Snow | – | 54 |
| Comfort | 55 | 60 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 42 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
50
/ 100
Energy EV
55
/ 100
Energy Saver A/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy EV
Pros
- Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
- Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
- Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design
Cons
- High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
- Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
- Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
Tire B Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy EV | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
50
/ 100
Michelin Energy EV
55
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver A/S — better treadwear, handling and dry. Where the Michelin Energy EV is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Michelin Energy EV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 57 vs 42 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 50 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 56 vs 51 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 60 vs 55 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Energy EV
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy EV or Energy Saver A/S?
Which is better in the wet, Energy EV or Energy Saver A/S?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 54 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy EV or Energy Saver A/S?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 56 vs 51 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy EV or Energy Saver A/S?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 60 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy EV or Energy Saver A/S?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 57 vs 42 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology