Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Energy EV vs Toyo Celsius — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 5 + 152 owner reviews. How we score

Celsius is ahead, 61–50

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Energy EV
Tire AMichelin

Energy EV

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 40 · 5 reviews

Toyo Celsius
Tire BToyo

Celsius

All Season

Tests 56 · 6 tests Owners 68 · 152 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 51

    Dry

    Celsius +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVCelsius
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 57 (est.)48
    Reviews found online4267

    Energy EV: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 51

    Celsius: 60% × 47.8 + 40% × 66.5 = 55

    No road tests of dry for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 55

    Wet

    Celsius +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVCelsius
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 59 (est.)54
    Reviews found online5070

    Energy EV: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 55

    Celsius: 60% × 54.1 + 40% × 70.4 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVCelsius
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–76
    Reviews found online–70

    Celsius: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 70.3 = 74

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Celsius +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVCelsius
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4169

    Energy EV: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 55

    Celsius: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Energy EV or Celsius. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVCelsius
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–48
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Celsius: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 56

    No owner ratings of noise for Celsius. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 42

    Treadwear

    Celsius +25
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVCelsius
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online2567

    Energy EV: 60% × 53.1 (est.) + 40% × 25 = 42

    Celsius: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Celsius. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 43

    Handling (owners)

    Celsius +21
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy EVCelsius
    Reviews found online4364
Scores at a glance
Michelin Energy EV vs Toyo Celsius: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Energy EVToyo Celsius
Relative Score 50 61
Dry 51 55
Wet 55 61
Snow – 74
Comfort 55 69
Noise – 56
Treadwear 42 67
Handling (owners) 43 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Energy EV

Celsius

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Energy EV

Pros

  • Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
  • Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
  • Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design

Cons

  • High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
  • Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
  • Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
All owner themes in the Energy EV review

Tire B Celsius

Pros

  • Exceptional snow and winter weather performance
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • High value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some complaints regarding wet traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a bouncy feel or slower steering response
  • Faster tread wear reported by certain users compared to competitors like Michelin
All owner themes in the Celsius review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Energy EV B · Toyo Celsius
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available152
Rim diameters16″14″ – 20″
Tread depth—10 - 11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Energy EV

Toyo Celsius

Winner: Toyo Celsius — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy EV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Celsius scores 67 vs 42 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Celsius scores 64 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Celsius scores 69 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Celsius scores 61 vs 55 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Energy EV
Tire B · Toyo Celsius

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Energy EV or Celsius?

Which is better in the wet, Energy EV or Celsius?

Toyo Celsius, 61 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Energy EV or Celsius?

Toyo Celsius, 55 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Energy EV or Celsius?

Toyo Celsius, 69 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Energy EV or Celsius?

Toyo Celsius, 67 vs 42 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology