Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 5 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy EV vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 72–49
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +2071Why this score
Source Energy EV BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 42 73 Energy EV: 60% × 57.2 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 51
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
54
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +2175Why this score
Source Energy EV BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 48 76 Energy EV: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 54
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
49
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +2473Why this score
Source Energy EV BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 39 76 Energy EV: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 39.1 = 49
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
41
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +2667Why this score
Source Energy EV BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 25 67 Energy EV: 60% × 51.7 (est.) + 40% × 25 = 41
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Energy EV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
42
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +3476Why this score
Source Energy EV BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 42 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy EV | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 49 | 72 |
| Dry | 51 | 71 |
| Wet | 54 | 75 |
| Comfort | 49 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 41 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
49
/ 100
Energy EV
72
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy EV
Pros
- Commendable grip levels in both dry and wet conditions
- Effective contribution to vehicle range maximization
- Performance comparable to higher-tier performance tires despite eco-focused design
Cons
- High susceptibility to sidewall damage and punctures
- Premature aging, including cracking and block degradation
- Rapid tread wear on front-wheel-drive configurations
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy EV | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
49
/ 100
Michelin Energy EV
72
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy EV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 76 vs 42 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 67 vs 41 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 49 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 54 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Energy EV
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy EV or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, Energy EV or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy EV or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 51 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy EV or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy EV or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 67 vs 41 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology