Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 0 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · none yet
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Advantage T/A Sport LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) – Reviews found online 45 – Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Advantage T/A Sport LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) – Reviews found online 44 – Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
54
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Advantage T/A Sport LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 44 – Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 54
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
53
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Advantage T/A Sport LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 46 – Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.7 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Advantage T/A Sport LT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) – Reviews found online 45 – Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
46
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Advantage T/A Sport LT Reviews found online 46 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | – |
| Dry | 53 | – |
| Wet | 51 | – |
| Snow | 54 | – |
| Comfort | 53 | – |
| Treadwear | 53 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
52
/ 100
Energy Saver A/S
–
/ 100
Advantage T/A Sport LT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Tire B Advantage T/A Sport LT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 660 - 740 B A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
52
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
–
/ 100
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
Only Michelin Energy Saver A/S has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology