Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Continental PureContact LS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

PureContact LS is ahead, 70–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    PureContact LS +15
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPureContact LS
    Reviews found online4973
  2. 54

    Wet

    PureContact LS +19
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPureContact LS
    Reviews found online4874
  3. 54

    Snow

    PureContact LS +13
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPureContact LS
    Reviews found online4464
  4. 60

    Comfort

    PureContact LS +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPureContact LS
    Reviews found online5161
  5. 61

    Noise

    PureContact LS +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPureContact LS
    Reviews found online5273
  6. 57

    Treadwear

    PureContact LS +11
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPureContact LS
    Reviews found online5169
  7. 50

    Handling

    PureContact LS +23
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEnergy Saver A/SPureContact LS
    Reviews found online5073
Scores at a glance
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Continental PureContact LS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Energy Saver A/SContinental PureContact LS
Relative Score 55 70
Dry 56 71
Wet 54 73
Snow 54 67
Comfort 60 65
Noise 61 69
Treadwear 57 68
Handling 50 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Energy Saver A/S

PureContact LS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Tire B PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S B · Continental PureContact LS
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—700 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Continental PureContact LS

Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 54 on snow.

Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Continental PureContact LS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

PureContact LS

Amazon