Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Continental PureContact LS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PureContact LS is ahead, 70–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 25 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
PureContact LS +1571Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S PureContact LS Reviews found online 49 73 -
54
Wet
PureContact LS +1973Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S PureContact LS Reviews found online 48 74 -
54
Snow
PureContact LS +1367Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S PureContact LS Reviews found online 44 64 -
60
Comfort
PureContact LS +565Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S PureContact LS Reviews found online 51 61 -
61
Noise
PureContact LS +869Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S PureContact LS Reviews found online 52 73 -
57
Treadwear
PureContact LS +1168Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S PureContact LS Reviews found online 51 69 -
50
Handling
PureContact LS +2373Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S PureContact LS Reviews found online 50 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 70 |
| Dry | 56 | 71 |
| Wet | 54 | 73 |
| Snow | 54 | 67 |
| Comfort | 60 | 65 |
| Noise | 61 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 68 |
| Handling | 50 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Energy Saver A/S
PureContact LS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Tire B PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 700 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Continental PureContact LS
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 50 on handling.
Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 54 on wet.
Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 56 on dry.
Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 54 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.