Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 21 road tests and 10 + 12,714 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 83–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,714 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)
“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 +3587Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 89 Reviews found online 44 84 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 52
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 +3889Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 43 84 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 51
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.4 = 89
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 44 – Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 55
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
Pilot Sport 4 +2476Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 45 72 Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52
Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.6 + 60% × 71.7 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 73 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
53
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 +1871Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 45 60 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 53
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
45
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 +3681Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Reviews found online 45 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison76Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 83 |
| Dry | 52 | 87 |
| Wet | 51 | 89 |
| Snow | 55 | – |
| Comfort | 52 | 76 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 45 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
51
/ 100
Energy Saver A/S
83
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Tire B Pilot Sport 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
- Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving
Cons
- Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
- Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.
r/JettaGLI
·59 upvotes ·2026-09-27
“Reminder: Tires are the key to this car Just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport 4 AS tires with a new set ahead of the rainy season. Lasted 36K miles. It was the best mod to the car and a fresh set reminded just how good a brand new set is. The car is glued to the road, riding wonderfully smooth and quiet. Spend the money, get the best tires for you. The tune can wait. And it will need it.”
r/BoltEV
·5 upvotes ·2026-04-29
“Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are noisy (a followup) I have been asked on this sub if the PS4 tires on my wife’s Bolt are noisy, and I wasn’t sure how to answer. Well, we made two 60-mile round trips this past weekend, mostly on highways with 55 and 70 mph speed limits, and I have to say that the tires are kind of noisy. Certainly not as quiet as EV-oriented tires are. The grip is fantastic, so we really like them. If you are sensitive to noise, though, these Max Performance class tires are probably not for you.”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by weston.__ I will be going down the non-rft route, Pilot Sport 4. You're not the only one to say the ride quality with non-rft is a massive improvement and this is the reason why I will change once the time comes. I went from Bridgestone S001 RFT to 'go-flats' and have found the suppleness an obvious difference. Since I put the pressure to the mid point between the low and high load plated pressures I have yet to have any of the heartstopping thumps come through the suspension that the Bridgestone seemed prone to.”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires
Based on 246 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 62 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 480 A - B A - B | 300 - 320 A - AA A |
Which one should you actually buy?
51
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
83
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 52 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 52 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport 4?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology