Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Energy Saver A/S is ahead, 56–38
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 22 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
Energy Saver A/S +1937Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 49 21 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
54
Wet
Energy Saver A/S +2232Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 41 (est.) Reviews found online 49 19 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 54
Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
54
Snow
Energy Saver A/S +648Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 43 33 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54
Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Energy Saver A/S +1941Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 50 14 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 60
Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Energy Saver A/S +952Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 53 29 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 61
Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52
No road tests of noise for Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Energy Saver A/S +1839Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 51 20 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
50
Handling (owners)
Energy Saver A/S +2723Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Geolandar G91A Reviews found online 50 23
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Yokohama Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 38 |
| Dry | 56 | 37 |
| Wet | 54 | 32 |
| Snow | 54 | 48 |
| Comfort | 60 | 41 |
| Noise | 61 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 39 |
| Handling (owners) | 50 | 23 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
Energy Saver A/S
38
/ 100
Geolandar G91A
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Tire B Geolandar G91A
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 B A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
38
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver A/S — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 50 vs 23 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 54 vs 32 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 56 vs 37 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy Saver A/S scores 60 vs 41 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 54 vs 32 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 56 vs 37 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 54 vs 48 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 61 vs 52 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 60 vs 41 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver A/S or Geolandar G91A?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S, 57 vs 39 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology