Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 65 reviews
Michelin Energy Saver+ vs Pirelli CINTURA/TO P4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 65 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Energy Saver+ is ahead, 70–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Energy Saver+ +1456Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CINTURA/TO P4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 71 49 Energy Saver+: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70
CINTURA/TO P4: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 56
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for CINTURA/TO P4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
Energy Saver+ +1257Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CINTURA/TO P4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 69 53 Energy Saver+: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
CINTURA/TO P4: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 57
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for CINTURA/TO P4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
71
Comfort
Energy Saver+ +1457Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CINTURA/TO P4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 72 45 Energy Saver+: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
CINTURA/TO P4: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver+ or CINTURA/TO P4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Energy Saver+ +1458Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CINTURA/TO P4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 76 52 Energy Saver+: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 72
CINTURA/TO P4: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for CINTURA/TO P4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Energy Saver+ +3140Why this score
Source Energy Saver+ CINTURA/TO P4 Reviews found online 71 40
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver+ | Pirelli CINTURA/TO P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 55 |
| Dry | 70 | 56 |
| Wet | 69 | 57 |
| Comfort | 71 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 40 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Energy Saver+
CINTURA/TO P4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver+
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear and longevity with many users reporting high mileage (30,000 to 60,000+ miles)
- Impressive fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather traction and slippery behavior during cornering or braking in the rain
- Prone to aquaplaning at higher speeds on wet roads
- Tendency to develop sidewall cracking or dry rot as the tires age
Tire B CINTURA/TO P4
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and high mileage capability
- Predictable performance on dry, steady-state roads
- Progressive handling characteristics on specific vehicle chassis
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and high risk of understeer
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Excessive road noise
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver+ | B · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 16″ | 13″ – 14″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy Saver+
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P4
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver+ — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Pirelli CINTURA/TO P4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 71 vs 40 on handling.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 70 vs 56 on dry.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 71 vs 57 on comfort.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 72 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver+ or CINTURA/TO P4?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver+ or CINTURA/TO P4?
Michelin Energy Saver+, 69 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver+ or CINTURA/TO P4?
Michelin Energy Saver+, 70 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver+ or CINTURA/TO P4?
Michelin Energy Saver+, 71 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver+ or CINTURA/TO P4?
Michelin Energy Saver+, 72 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology