Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 7 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy X2+ vs Yokohama AVS Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Energy X2+ 75, AVS Sport 74.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
AVS Sport +175Why this score
Source Energy X2+ AVS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 77 80 Energy X2+: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
AVS Sport: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Energy X2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
78
Wet
Energy X2+ +474Why this score
Source Energy X2+ AVS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 81 75 Energy X2+: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 78
AVS Sport: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74
No road tests of wet for Energy X2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
72
Comfort
Energy X2+ +171Why this score
Source Energy X2+ AVS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 76 73 Energy X2+: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72
AVS Sport: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Energy X2+ or AVS Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Energy X2+ +468Why this score
Source Energy X2+ AVS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 76 70 Energy X2+: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72
AVS Sport: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Energy X2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
75
Handling (owners)
AVS Sport +580Why this score
Source Energy X2+ AVS Sport Reviews found online 75 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy X2+ | Yokohama AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 74 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 78 | 74 |
| Comfort | 72 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Energy X2+
74
/ 100
AVS Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy X2+
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Tire B AVS Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet weather traction
- High level of handling precision and cornering confidence
- Impressive tread life relative to its performance category
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, particularly during the first half of the tread life
- Limited availability due to the tire being out of production
- Performance degradation noted when tread depth reaches the final 2mm
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy X2+ | B · Yokohama AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Michelin Energy X2+
74
/ 100
Yokohama AVS Sport
Too close to call: Michelin Energy X2+ and Yokohama AVS Sport are within 2 points overall. Michelin Energy X2+ is stronger on wet and treadwear. Michelin Energy X2+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama AVS Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 78 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 68 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Energy X2+
Tire B · Yokohama AVS Sport
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy X2+ or AVS Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Energy X2+ or AVS Sport?
Michelin Energy X2+, 78 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy X2+ or AVS Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Energy X2+ or AVS Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Energy X2+ or AVS Sport?
Michelin Energy X2+, 72 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology