Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 6 reviews
Yokohama AVS Sport vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 6 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4+ leads, 78–74 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 83 · 10 tests Owners 72 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Primacy 4+ +378Why this score
Source AVS Sport Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 80 72 AVS Sport: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
Primacy 4+: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 78
No road tests of dry for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Primacy 4+ +579Why this score
Source AVS Sport Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 75 75 AVS Sport: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74
Primacy 4+: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 75.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
71
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +273Why this score
Source AVS Sport Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 73 72 AVS Sport: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
Primacy 4+: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for AVS Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source AVS Sport Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +1482Why this score
Source AVS Sport Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 90 Reviews found online 70 70 AVS Sport: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68
Primacy 4+: 60% × 89.8 + 40% × 70.3 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for AVS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
80
Handling (owners)
AVS Sport +1268Why this score
Source AVS Sport Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 80 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVS Sport | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 78 |
| Dry | 75 | 78 |
| Wet | 74 | 79 |
| Comfort | 71 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
AVS Sport
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVS Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet weather traction
- High level of handling precision and cornering confidence
- Impressive tread life relative to its performance category
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, particularly during the first half of the tread life
- Limited availability due to the tire being out of production
- Performance degradation noted when tread depth reaches the final 2mm
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVS Sport | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVS Sport
Michelin Primacy 4+
Narrow edge: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama AVS Sport if handling matters most to you. Yokohama AVS Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 82 vs 68 on treadwear.
Yokohama AVS Sport scores 80 vs 68 on handling.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 74 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 75 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVS Sport or Primacy 4+?
Which is better in the wet, AVS Sport or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVS Sport or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, AVS Sport or Primacy 4+?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, AVS Sport or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 82 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology