Tests 80 · 7 tests Owners 58 · 2,210 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
“Just Installed Michelin e.Primacy on my 2021 model 3 long range and they’ve been so good. Def on the pricey side but worth it.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 23 road tests and 2,210 + 13,422 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4 is ahead, 80–70
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 7 tests Owners 58 · 2,210 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
“Just Installed Michelin e.Primacy on my 2021 model 3 long range and they’ve been so good. Def on the pricey side but worth it.”
Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 77 · 13,422 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Primacy 4s on my Volvo wagon. I've been very pleased. Plenty of grip, low road noise and longevity.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 21 tests | 79 | 86 |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 75 |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 99% |
e.Primacy: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 55 = 70
Primacy 4: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 82
| Source | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 22 tests | 71 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 50 | 80 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 92% | 99% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 89% | 100% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 79% | 91% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 94% | 98% |
e.Primacy: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 50.2 = 63
Primacy 4: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 79.5 = 83
| Source | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests | 87 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 76 |
e.Primacy: 40% × 87.2 + 60% × 64.3 = 73
Primacy 4: 40% × 75.4 + 60% × 75.8 = 76
| Source | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 15 tests | 79 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
e.Primacy: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
Primacy 4: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for e.Primacy or Primacy 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests | 88 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 75 |
e.Primacy: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 68.4 = 80
Primacy 4: 60% × 84.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 81
| Source | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 54 | 75 |
| Source | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 15 tests | 97 | 93 |
| Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 96% |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 72% |
| Category | Michelin e.Primacy | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 80 |
| Dry | 70 | 82 |
| Wet | 63 | 83 |
| Comfort | 73 | 76 |
| Noise | 74 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 81 |
| Handling (owners) | 54 | 75 |
| Efficiency | 97 | 93 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
e.Primacy
Primacy 4
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin e.Primacy finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Primacy 4 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | e.Primacy | Primacy 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 Tesla Model 3 EV Tyre Test | 99% #3/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | −0.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 Tesla Model 3 EV Tyre Test | 63% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 92% | 99% | −7.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 89% | 100% | −11.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 79% | 91% | −12.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% | 98% | −4.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 97% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 Tesla Model 3 EV Tyre Test | 93% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #2/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 92% #4/8 · 2022 Motor Crossover Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 Tesla Model 3 EV Tyre Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 100% #1/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 87% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 99% | 96% | +3.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% | 72% | +28.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 56% | 60% | −4.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 60% #9/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 83% #8/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/10 | #5/10 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Michelin e.Primacy is generally positive, with drivers appreciating its low rolling resistance, range improvements, smooth comfort, and low road noise. Some users note compromises regarding wet and winter grip compared to performance-oriented tires, while others discuss pricing and availability challenges.
“New Tires: Michelin e.Primacy ... anyone with experience? I'm losing 0.5psi per minute (patched, but on the shoulder). I blocked it to save the rim. I chose the Michelin e.Primacy and I'm just curious if anyone else has done the same switch. I'm done with the Continentals. Awesome on my mountain bike, but I'm not pleased with them on the Y. I think I'm at 5 plugs and 1 patch. Regular commuter type driving, nothing fancy (I got kids man). Read more”
“Michelin E Primacy opinions? Hello, I have a 2023 BMW X3 RWD. The original tires are currently at 4 mm in the front and 3.5 mm in the rear after 24k miles, so they’re almost due for replacement. The car is mainly driven in town, and we live in southern Tennessee where snow is very rare (maybe 1–2 days a year), although temperatures do drop below freezing in the winter. I’m considering Michelin e.Primacy (grand touring summer) tires since they’re available at a great price—about $158 each after rebate. Would these be a poor choice for this type of climate?”
“Michelin E.Primacy vs Pilot Sport 4 — care iau vara 2026 pentru sedan compact? Salutare! Trebuie să schimb anvelopele de iarnă și m-am blocat între două variante Michelin pentru 205/55 R16. Amândouă sunt verificate de ani de zile, dar profilele sunt foarte diferite. Michelin E.Primacy — 94H Anvelopă eco, gândită pentru consum redus și confort. Testele independente arată un consum cu 15-20% mai mic față de un Pilot Sport 4 pe autostradă. Zgomot redus, confortabilă pe drumuri naționale. Perfectă dacă faci în principal drumuri lungi și vrei să economisești la pompă. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — 94Y Ea e anvelopa sportivă din gama Michelin. Aderență uscat excelentă, răspuns precis la direcție, se simte o diferență clară în viraje. Dar consumă mai mult și e puțin mai zgomotoasă. Dacă îți place să conduci dinamic, asta e alegerea clară. Contextul meu: Sedan compact, ~1300 kg Drumuri mixte: 50% oraș, 30% național, 20% autostradă Conducere normală, nu agresivă Buget mediu spre sus Ceea ce m-a atras la E.Primacy e voucherul Michelin activ până la 30 aprilie — 300-500 lei înapoi la set de 4 anvelope. Practic diferența de preț față de Pilot Sport 4 se micșorează considerabil. Voi ce ați alege între cele două? Sau aveți alte recomandări în aceeași gamă de preț?”
Based on 20 community posts
The Michelin Primacy 4 is generally praised for its comfortable ride, low road noise, and strong braking and safety in both dry and wet conditions. While many users report excellent tread longevity across tens of thousands of kilometers, some note faster wear on heavier electric vehicles or rough surfaces. It is viewed as a premium touring tire that is unsuitable for winter conditions, prompting some drivers to weigh its high price against newer models like the Primacy 5 or cheaper alternatives.
“Gomme alternative a Primacy 4 Buongiorno, ho una Peugeot 208 del 2020 con delle Michelin Primacy 4 205/45 R 17 88 V, le ho da 4 anni, circa 20000km all’anno tranne quest’anno che non le ho sostituite con le invernali e che quindi dovrei portarle ad usura completa con il prossimo “giro” delle gomme per altri 20000km. In totale arriverò a quasi 100000km, quindi super ammortizzate e le consiglierei sempre anche per la tenuta. Visto che entro fine estate pensavo di sostituirle tutte e quattro, vorrei capire se ci fossero delle alternative un più economiche ma altrettanto valide (un cambio gomme al momento mi costa circa €650-700). Read more”
“I might try to have a look at one today. There are two Uniroyal shops near me. Whether they have one in stock to look at though...? The trouble is they look really nice online but I'd like to see them in the flesh first. The old tyres (above photo) that were on these wheels were that nice square edged profile that I like, much the same as the Michelin Pilot Sports. These are going on my sons Golf EV so I'm also trying to consider if they are A rated for fuel, the best wet grip I can find and the lowest decibel level. The best choice I can find is the Michelin Primacy 4 which are A, A and 68. But on Black Circles it says they were designed for BMW. I'm sure they fit any wheel but do those properties still hold? I've always bought Pilots but B, B and 72, and its this 72 that really bugs me, is whats making me invest so much time into getting the right tyre for Toms EV. I'm getting a Tesla this Tuesday which does in fact come with the Pilots so they must be good on EV's anyway. Who knew buying tyres was so complicated.”
“Michelin Primacy 4 or Conti UC6 - Virtus GT Hey, i recently got a Virtus GT with stock Apollo alnac 4g tyres - looking to upgrade them. As per ChatGPT my options are Michelin Primacy 4 and Continental UC6 - budget is not really a problem. Overall i want good grip, handling, comfort and low cabin noise. Not going for Pilot Sport 4, because don't want to compromise on comfort for performance when i am not going to push my car too much, hence PS4 is a no no. But read it somewhere that with Primacy 4, there is a noticeable difference in mileage not sure if it means going up or down. Need recommendations on what i should get! Thanks in advance”
Based on 43 community posts
| Attribute | A · Michelin e.Primacy | B · Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | 57 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 340 A - B A | 340 A A |
| Sizes in common | 34 | 34 |
Michelin e.Primacy
Michelin Primacy 4
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Michelin e.Primacy if efficiency and noise matter most to you.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 75 vs 54 on handling.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 83 vs 63 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 82 vs 70 on dry.
Michelin e.Primacy scores 97 vs 93 on efficiency.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Primacy 4, 83 vs 63 on our wet score.
Michelin Primacy 4, 82 vs 70 on our dry score.
Michelin e.Primacy, 74 vs 71 on our noise score.
Michelin Primacy 4, 76 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 81 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Michelin e.Primacy, 97 vs 93 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology