Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Latitude Sport 3 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 1,922 + 907 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Latitude Sport 3 and Azenis FK510 are level at 74.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Latitude Sport 3
Tire AMichelin

Latitude Sport 3

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 1,922 reviews

“After 27,000 miles the Michelin Latitude Sport 3 (255/60R17 106V) tires on my Envoy are pretty worn. They are pretty decent tires, but it seems longevity is not one of its strong points; even with regular rotations (and road force balancing if required) every 6,000 miles and maintaining the correct pressures. I was actually considering another set, but it seems COVID is an excuse for incompetence among other things these days and they are not available in this size. I was told in October that the shipment would arrive in January, but now I'm being told it will arrive in April. At this point, these tires are in dire need of replacement for safety reason and there is absolutely no way I can wait another three months. I've been looking at my options; namely Toyo Proxes T1 Sport , Dunlop SP Sport Maxx 050+ and the Bridgestone Alenza 001 that I'm heavily leaning towards. Wondering if anyone on here has any experience with them.”

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 4

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 28 tests≈ 72 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7875

    Latitude Sport 3: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 74

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +8
    85
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 29 tests≈ 76 (est.)89
    Reviews found online8078

    Latitude Sport 3: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.3 = 85

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–46

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Latitude Sport 3 +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 69 (est.)42
    Reviews found online6768

    Latitude Sport 3: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests–66
    Reviews found online–67

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 = 67

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Latitude Sport 3 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7054

    Latitude Sport 3: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Latitude Sport 3 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online7672
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    51
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests–51
Scores at a glance
Michelin Latitude Sport 3 vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Latitude Sport 3Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 74 74
Dry 74 74
Wet 77 85
Snow – 55
Comfort 68 57
Noise – 67
Treadwear 68 66
Handling (owners) 76 72
Efficiency – 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Latitude Sport 3

± 4

Azenis FK510

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryLatitude Sport 3Azenis FK510ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/7 2016 Autobild 4x4 / SUV Tyre Test #7/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Latitude Sport 3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry weather traction and braking performance
  • Precise steering response and confident high-speed cornering stability
  • Quiet, smooth ride quality that improves overall vehicle refinement

Cons

  • High initial purchase price compared to alternative brands
  • Increased road noise on coarse chip-seal or worn-out road surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported on specific heavy or performance-oriented applications
All owner themes in the Latitude Sport 3 review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Latitude Sport 3

Mixed

Community opinion on the Michelin Latitude Sport 3 is mixed, with strong praise for dry traction, wet grip, and reduced road noise compared to OEM alternatives. However, users frequently criticize its relatively short tread life and limited cold-weather capability, with several noting crabbing or rough road droning. Many owners also debate replacing it with newer alternatives like the Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-01-30

“After 27,000 miles the Michelin Latitude Sport 3 (255/60R17 106V) tires on my Envoy are pretty worn. They are pretty decent tires, but it seems longevity is not one of its strong points; even with regular rotations (and road force balancing if required) every 6,000 miles and maintaining the correct pressures. I was actually considering another set, but it seems COVID is an excuse for incompetence among other things these days and they are not available in this size. I was told in October that the shipment would arrive in January, but now I'm being told it will arrive in April. At this point, these tires are in dire need of replacement for safety reason and there is absolutely no way I can wait another three months. I've been looking at my options; namely Toyo Proxes T1 Sport , Dunlop SP Sport Maxx 050+ and the Bridgestone Alenza 001 that I'm heavily leaning towards. Wondering if anyone on here has any experience with them.”

mbworld.org

“Are Michelin Latitude Sport 3 235/50R19 MO tires good on a GLB? I'm thinking of making the switch from Continental ProContact GX SSR 235/50ZR19 MOE tires that came on my 2022 GLB 35. The Continentals have somewhat sloppy handling, are too harsh over bumps and bounce too much for me over uneven pavement, particularly on the highway. Since the Michelins are summer tires and weigh about 2.5 pounds apiece less than the Continentals, I'm hoping the ride, responsiveness and handling will be better, plus I'm not concerned with Michelin's lower rated tread life. Going to 20" wheels aren't an option.”

bimmerfest.com ·1 upvote ·2023-10-02

“"Install four Michelin Latitude Sport 3 RFT replacing Bridgestone Alenza RFT at 36,300 miles." Calendar entry above. For us, it made all the difference in the world. Retired, so most of our travels are on I-77, I-26 and I-95. Couldn't hear each other talk with the Alenzas. Approaching 50,000 miles now and couldn't be happier. Made an incredible difference in ride comfort and noise. Not sure how many more miles are left on the tires , but they appear to be almost like new. My X3 M40i doesn't have a spare and I'm not comfortable going to a non- RFT since I'm 74 years old and haven't changed a tire in 30 years. Can't understand why Bridgestone continues to sell the Alenza tires or why BMW continues to put them on their performance cars.”

Top themes
#tread life longevity#wet and dry grip#road noise and comfort#cold weather crabbing#comparison to Pilot Sport#run-flat performance

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/Autocross ·1 upvote ·2023-12-18

“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”

corvetteforum.com

“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Sport 3 B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2393
Rim diameters17″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Latitude Sport 3

Falken Azenis FK510

Too close to call: Michelin Latitude Sport 3 and Falken Azenis FK510 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Latitude Sport 3 is stronger on comfort. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Latitude Sport 3 scores 68 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 85 vs 77 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Sport 3
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Latitude Sport 3 or Azenis FK510?

Which is better in the wet, Latitude Sport 3 or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 85 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Sport 3 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Latitude Sport 3 or Azenis FK510?

Michelin Latitude Sport 3, 68 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Latitude Sport 3 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology