Michelin Pilot Exalto looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Latitude Sport 3 vs Michelin Pilot Exalto — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,932 + 56 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Latitude Sport 3 74, Pilot Exalto 73.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Latitude Sport 3
Tire AMichelin

Latitude Sport 3

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 1,932 reviews

“After 27,000 miles the Michelin Latitude Sport 3 (255/60R17 106V) tires on my Envoy are pretty worn. They are pretty decent tires, but it seems longevity is not one of its strong points; even with regular rotations (and road force balancing if required) every 6,000 miles and maintaining the correct pressures. I was actually considering another set, but it seems COVID is an excuse for incompetence among other things these days and they are not available in this size. I was told in October that the shipment would arrive in January, but now I'm being told it will arrive in April. At this point, these tires are in dire need of replacement for safety reason and there is absolutely no way I can wait another three months. I've been looking at my options; namely Toyo Proxes T1 Sport , Dunlop SP Sport Maxx 050+ and the Bridgestone Alenza 001 that I'm heavily leaning towards. Wondering if anyone on here has any experience with them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Latitude Sport 3 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Pilot Exalto
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    Latitude Sport 3: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74

    Pilot Exalto: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Exalto. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Latitude Sport 3 +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Pilot Exalto
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8077

    Latitude Sport 3: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 77

    Pilot Exalto: 60% × 74.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Exalto. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Pilot Exalto +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Pilot Exalto
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6770

    Latitude Sport 3: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67

    Pilot Exalto: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Exalto. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 69

    Treadwear

    Pilot Exalto +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Pilot Exalto
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7075

    Latitude Sport 3: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69

    Pilot Exalto: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Exalto. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Sport 3Pilot Exalto
    Reviews found online7575
Scores at a glance
Michelin Latitude Sport 3 vs Michelin Pilot Exalto: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Latitude Sport 3Michelin Pilot Exalto
Relative Score 74 73
Dry 74 73
Wet 77 76
Comfort 67 69
Treadwear 69 71
Handling (owners) 75 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Latitude Sport 3

± 8

Pilot Exalto

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Latitude Sport 3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry weather traction and braking performance
  • Precise steering response and confident high-speed cornering stability
  • Quiet, smooth ride quality that improves overall vehicle refinement

Cons

  • High initial purchase price compared to alternative brands
  • Increased road noise on coarse chip-seal or worn-out road surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported on specific heavy or performance-oriented applications
All owner themes in the Latitude Sport 3 review

Tire B Pilot Exalto

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Progressive handling characteristics near the limit

Cons

  • High retail price point
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and responsiveness
  • Increased road noise reported by some users
All owner themes in the Pilot Exalto review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Latitude Sport 3

Mixed

Community opinion on the Michelin Latitude Sport 3 is mixed, with strong praise for dry traction, wet grip, and reduced road noise compared to OEM alternatives. However, users frequently criticize its relatively short tread life and limited cold-weather capability, with several noting crabbing or rough road droning. Many owners also debate replacing it with newer alternatives like the Pilot Sport 4 SUV.

audiworld.com

“Trying to decide which tire to change to. 255/45R20 Michelin Latitude Sport 3 was the OEM tire when I first bought the car new back in 2017. Lasted around 36k miles. Currently Using Bridgestone Alenza 001 and it's almost time for replacement. 43k miles on them. I'm deciding between Latitude Sport 3 101W AO and Pilot Sport 4s (105Y) XL. Price difference is about $50 dollars for the Pilot Sport 4s. Does anyone have experience with both these tires on the the Q5 2.0T FY model and how they perform? My driving style is not aggressive, but I do drive a bit fast.”

mbworld.org

“Are Michelin Latitude Sport 3 235/50R19 MO tires good on a GLB? I'm thinking of making the switch from Continental ProContact GX SSR 235/50ZR19 MOE tires that came on my 2022 GLB 35. The Continentals have somewhat sloppy handling, are too harsh over bumps and bounce too much for me over uneven pavement, particularly on the highway. Since the Michelins are summer tires and weigh about 2.5 pounds apiece less than the Continentals, I'm hoping the ride, responsiveness and handling will be better, plus I'm not concerned with Michelin's lower rated tread life. Going to 20" wheels aren't an option.”

bimmerfest.com ·1 upvote ·2023-10-02

“"Install four Michelin Latitude Sport 3 RFT replacing Bridgestone Alenza RFT at 36,300 miles." Calendar entry above. For us, it made all the difference in the world. Retired, so most of our travels are on I-77, I-26 and I-95. Couldn't hear each other talk with the Alenzas. Approaching 50,000 miles now and couldn't be happier. Made an incredible difference in ride comfort and noise. Not sure how many more miles are left on the tires , but they appear to be almost like new. My X3 M40i doesn't have a spare and I'm not comfortable going to a non- RFT since I'm 74 years old and haven't changed a tire in 30 years. Can't understand why Bridgestone continues to sell the Alenza tires or why BMW continues to put them on their performance cars.”

Top themes
#tread life longevity#wet and dry grip#road noise and comfort#cold weather crabbing#comparison to Pilot Sport#run-flat performance

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Exalto

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Sport 3 B · Michelin Pilot Exalto
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available23—
Rim diameters17″ – 20″—
UTQG220 A - AA A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Latitude Sport 3

Michelin Pilot Exalto

Too close to call: Michelin Latitude Sport 3 and Michelin Pilot Exalto are within 2 points overall.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Sport 3
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Exalto

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Latitude Sport 3 or Pilot Exalto?

Which is better in the wet, Latitude Sport 3 or Pilot Exalto?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Sport 3 or Pilot Exalto?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Latitude Sport 3 or Pilot Exalto?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Latitude Sport 3 or Pilot Exalto?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology