Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 12 reviews
Michelin Latitude Sport vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 564 owner reviews. How we score
Latitude Sport is ahead, 66–53
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 564 reviews
“I'm a fan of the Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActives, picked those over the Cross Climate 2s for my XC90 . Not a fan of the Continental CrossContact LX Sports on the wife's 2025 XC60 . Handling in wet feels like absolute garbage, but can't justify swapping them out just yet, but plan to put the WeatherActives or Cross Climate 3s, that's if they come to the States, on her ride when tread is down. Both vehicles ride on 20" rims. I'm also a fan of Vredsteins Quartrac Pro+ and the Nokian Remedy WRG5. Looks like Nokian's Encompass AW02 are in the same vein as the Cross Climate 2 design.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Latitude Sport +1057Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 67 51 Latitude Sport: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
No road tests of dry for Latitude Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
Latitude Sport +1259Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 71 54 Latitude Sport: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59
No road tests of wet for Latitude Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison62Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 56 CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62
No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
Latitude Sport +559Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 61 55 Latitude Sport: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.4 = 64
CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.5 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Latitude Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Noise
No comparison63Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 58 CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 63
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Latitude Sport +1539Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 46 21 Latitude Sport: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 45.7 = 54
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 50.4 (est.) + 40% × 21.3 = 39
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Latitude Sport +2542Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 67 42
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Sport | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 53 |
| Dry | 67 | 57 |
| Wet | 71 | 59 |
| Snow | – | 62 |
| Comfort | 64 | 59 |
| Noise | – | 63 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 39 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 42 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Latitude Sport
CrossContact LX Sport
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Latitude Sport
Pros
- Strong wet and dry braking performance
- High levels of road comfort and low noise levels
- Consistent grip and feedback during spirited driving
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported on heavier or high-performance SUVs
- High price point relative to the expected lifespan for some users
- Increased road noise as the tire reaches the end of its tread life
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Latitude Sport
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with drivers frequently noting it as a standard factory OEM equipment on various SUVs and EVs. While some owners praise its low road noise, comfort, and solid dry handling, others criticize it for poor wet traction, quick tread wear, and issues like flaking or chunking. Many drivers consider replacing them with alternatives from Michelin, Pirelli, or EV-specific options once worn.
“CRV-Hybrid Touring owners, how do you like your OEM tires? I'm a proud new owner of a '26 ST and I have the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires on my car. I'm not crazy about them. I'm wondering if I should upgrade to Michelin Defenders or something. Thoughts? The Touring comes with the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport (not to be confused with LX25) or the Michelin Primacy A/S. I sorta wish I would have pushed them to switch me to the Primacy A/S. Read more”
“My tires were over inflated at purchase - with rears on my 2020 GLC 300 SUV showing 41.5 PSi, and the fronts were ~ 38.5 PSI. Checked cold tire pressure around sunrise this morning with temperature around 50 degrees. Using a high quality tire pressure gauge checked all tires this morning - and reduced pressure in all four tires to 35 PSI. Before the ride was ok but a bit stiff. Just curious if anyone is running these 18" tires and what you feel works best for your GLC 300's. I'd like to hear your thoughts & comments re: inflation pressure. 235/60 R 18 Continental Cross Contact LX Sport Tire size Inner fuel door pressurre table”
“Issues with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires Anybody having premature wear on their tires? In South Texas these tires are notorious for having flaking/peeling/chunking issues on the tread. Had to replace mine after 26k, but noticed the issues much earlier than that. Not a warrantable condition but Continental did give proration based on tread depth. Used the credit towards some new Michelins. Read more”
Based on 27 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Sport | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 20″ – 21″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 220 AA A | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Latitude Sport
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Michelin Latitude Sport — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Latitude Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 67 vs 42 on handling.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 54 vs 39 on treadwear.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 71 vs 59 on wet.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 67 vs 57 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 71 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 67 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 64 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 54 vs 39 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology