Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 12 reviews
Michelin Latitude Sport vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 561 owner reviews. How we score
Latitude Sport is ahead, 66–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 561 reviews
“It’s a compromise between ‘comfort’ ride and safety and handling. Advance driving course will add around 8psi cold. I find on any rim size additional 4psi makes a difference. Why ? Under heavy braking the tyre collapsed in the middle, by running higher inflation the complete width of the type is on the road, better braking efficiency - if under inflated only the outer edges keep in contact with the ground, causing less efficiency and longer distance to stop. Higher inflation also ensures tyre does not warp and twist on rim when turning. Too much inflation is just as bad, only the middle touches road - less braking efficiency and wear out tyre quicker. OEM recommended pressure is for comfort and sometimes sees increased edge wear over life of tyre. Regular tyre rotation and wheel balance and alignment will maximise tyre life. Try for yourself, But I have found around 4psi extra when cold is optimum.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Latitude Sport +959Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 69 54 Latitude Sport: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for Latitude Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
71
Wet
Latitude Sport +1061Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 71 58 Latitude Sport: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
No road tests of wet for Latitude Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison60Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online – 54 CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 60
No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
Latitude Sport +363Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 57 Latitude Sport: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
Latitude Sport +265Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 66 62 Latitude Sport: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 67
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Treadwear
Latitude Sport +1243Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 48 26 Latitude Sport: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 55
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 53.5 (est.) + 40% × 26.1 = 43
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Latitude Sport +2147Why this score
Source Latitude Sport CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 68 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Sport | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 57 |
| Dry | 68 | 59 |
| Wet | 71 | 61 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 66 | 63 |
| Noise | 67 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 43 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Latitude Sport
CrossContact LX Sport
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Latitude Sport
Pros
- Strong wet and dry braking performance
- High levels of road comfort and low noise levels
- Consistent grip and feedback during spirited driving
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported on heavier or high-performance SUVs
- High price point relative to the expected lifespan for some users
- Increased road noise as the tire reaches the end of its tread life
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Latitude Sport
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.
“Gouge on sidewall It’s a continental cross contact LX sport 235/65 R18. Got them last year but hit a sharp curb the other day. Not sure if I’m seeing any cords, there’s some white streaks deep in the gouge but it all seems in tact. Just need to drive this car for 3 more days, is it safe?”
“Trav- someone I know has these and likes them, good experience so far. When I look on TR, DT it does not show the 235-55-20 as an option. Maybe just current supply issues? I tried the Toyo website directly and it doesn't list them as being an option either. The Celsius Sport, yes, but not the Celsius CUV? The Walmart link doesn't have a purchase option for me just "show nearby availability" but none show. Your thoughts on the Celsius "Sport" if he was looking at that? My experience was with Continental CrossContact LX Sport and Bridgestone Dueler H/P Sport AS. They were both good dry and wet, wore out fast, total safety hazards in the snow, like plastic sled or saucer on a snowy hill bad. For me if winter/snow is a possibility and need reliable traction, anything tire that says sport is not.”
“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”
Based on 26 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Sport | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 20″ – 21″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Latitude Sport
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Michelin Latitude Sport — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Latitude Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 68 vs 47 on handling.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 55 vs 43 on treadwear.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 71 vs 61 on wet.
Michelin Latitude Sport scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 71 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 66 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Latitude Sport or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Sport, 55 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology