tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 15 + 217 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Alpin 5 SUV is ahead, 79–57

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

Winter

± 5

Tests 84 · 6 tests Owners 78 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire BHankook

Dynapro AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 217 reviews

“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +21
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests76≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online8151

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 76 + 40% × 80.5 = 78

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 82

    Wet

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +23
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests82≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8254

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 82.2 = 82

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 83

    Snow

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +22
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests88≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7556

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 75 = 83

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +22
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7746

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77.2 = 75

    Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.6 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 86

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests98–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 98.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 86

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Alpin 5 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +17
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7548

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 72

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Alpin 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Alpin 5 SUV +31
    48
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Reviews found online7948
  8. 63

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Alpin 5 SUVDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests63–
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUVHankook Dynapro AT2
Relative Score 79 57
Dry 78 57
Wet 82 59
Snow 83 61
Comfort 75 53
Noise 86 –
Treadwear 72 55
Handling (owners) 79 48
Efficiency 63 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

± 8

Dynapro AT2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling on wet and slushy roads
  • High tread life and durability over long distances
  • Excellent dry road comfort and low noise levels

Cons

  • Abrupt loss of grip when reaching the limit on hard-packed snow
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
  • Performance can feel less predictable than dedicated Nordic winter tires in extreme ice/snow conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Alpin 5 SUV review

Tire B Dynapro AT2

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
  • Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
  • Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
  • Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
  • Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 line is divided, heavily dependent on whether users evaluate the OEM factory tire or the retail/Xtreme version. The standard OEM AT2 receives notable criticism for lacking true all-terrain capability, poor wet/winter grip, and premature wear, while highway comfort and quietness are praised. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for strong snow traction, improved wet performance, durability, and quiet road manners.

r/hondapassport ·39 upvotes ·2024-09-11

“Fresh shoes 18x9.5 +38 gram light 57DR with 255/60 hankook dynapro AT2 Xtreme.”
r/4x4Australia ·4 upvotes ·2025-01-21

“Hankook AT2 Xtreme Any experience with them? Hankook is on sale at the moment. 70K km treadwear warranty.. :) I had AT2 few years ago and they were OK. Also, they were very quiet. Thinking about non-LT for softer ride..”
f150forum.com

“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Top themes
#OEM versus retail differences#Wet traction and braking#Winter and snow performance#Highway noise and comfort#Tread life and durability#Dynapro AT2 Xtreme upgrades

Based on 56 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
CategoryWinterAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available7133
Rim diameters17″ – 23″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 79 vs 48 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 82 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 83 vs 61 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV scores 75 vs 53 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, 82 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, 78 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, 83 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, 75 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Alpin 5 SUV or Dynapro AT2?

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV, 72 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology