Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Michelin Pilot Alpin vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 27 road tests and 5 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 870 P is ahead, 82–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 81 · 31 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
WinterContact TS 870 P +1581Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 65 79 Pilot Alpin: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 79 = 81
No road tests of dry for Pilot Alpin. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
WinterContact TS 870 P +2090Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 93 Reviews found online 70 86 Pilot Alpin: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 86.2 = 90
No road tests of wet for Pilot Alpin. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Snow
WinterContact TS 870 P +1678Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 58 76 Pilot Alpin: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 62
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 78.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 78
No road tests of snow for Pilot Alpin. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
WinterContact TS 870 P +1782Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 63 81 Pilot Alpin: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.9 = 65
WinterContact TS 870 P: 40% × 83.9 + 60% × 81.2 = 82
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Alpin. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison74Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests – 78 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 74
No owner ratings of noise for WinterContact TS 870 P. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
WinterContact TS 870 P +774Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 68 80 Pilot Alpin: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 67
WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 79.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Alpin. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS 870 P +1683Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Reviews found online 67 83 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison86Why this score
Source Pilot Alpin WinterContact TS 870 P Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests – 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Alpin | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 82 |
| Dry | 66 | 81 |
| Wet | 70 | 90 |
| Snow | 62 | 78 |
| Comfort | 65 | 82 |
| Noise | – | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 83 |
| Efficiency | – | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Alpin
WinterContact TS 870 P
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Alpin | WinterContact TS 870 P | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2009 Sport Auto Performance Winter Tyre Test | #1/18 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Alpin
Pros
- Amazing dry-road performance for a winter tire
- Extremely long-lasting tread wear and high mileage potential
- Even wear characteristics across the tire profile
Cons
- Not the best option for deep snow or ice conditions
- Grip on winter surfaces can feel somewhat ordinary
- Supply availability and stock issues reported by some users
Tire B WinterContact TS 870 P
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Outstanding wet weather and slush performance, cutting through heavy rain effortlessly
- Balanced dry and cold-weather handling with impressive cornering stability
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Steering response and initial stiffness are slightly softer and less sporty than dedicated summer tires or some rivals
- Snow and ice traction can feel less exceptional or borderline inadequate for a small subset of users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Alpin | B · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 121 |
| Rim diameters | 450″ | 16″ – 23″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Alpin
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better wet, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Alpin rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 90 vs 70 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 82 vs 65 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 78 vs 62 on snow.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 83 vs 67 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Alpin or WinterContact TS 870 P?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Alpin or WinterContact TS 870 P?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 90 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Alpin or WinterContact TS 870 P?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 81 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Pilot Alpin or WinterContact TS 870 P?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 78 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Alpin or WinterContact TS 870 P?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 82 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Alpin or WinterContact TS 870 P?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 74 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology