Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Exalto PE2 is ahead, 70–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Pilot Exalto PE2 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Exalto PE2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7366

    Pilot Exalto PE2: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Exalto PE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Pilot Exalto PE2 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Exalto PE2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7066

    Pilot Exalto PE2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Exalto PE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Exalto PE2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–55

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Pilot Exalto PE2 +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Exalto PE2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6854

    Pilot Exalto PE2: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.7 = 68

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Exalto PE2 or ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Exalto PE2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 64

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Pilot Exalto PE2 +8
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Exalto PE2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6653

    Pilot Exalto PE2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Exalto PE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Exalto PE2 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Exalto PE2ADVAN Neova AD07
    Reviews found online7267
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Exalto PE2Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Relative Score 70 65
Dry 71 67
Wet 70 67
Snow – 62
Comfort 68 59
Noise – 64
Treadwear 66 58
Handling (owners) 72 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Pilot Exalto PE2

± 8

ADVAN Neova AD07

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Exalto PE2

Pros

  • Exceptional dry weather grip and handling precision
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort compared to run-flat alternatives
  • Predictable and progressive handling behavior in wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in traction as the tire ages
  • Premium price point compared to competitors
  • Average wet weather performance in challenging conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Exalto PE2 review

Tire B ADVAN Neova AD07

Pros

  • Stunning and reliable dry grip
  • Incredibly progressive breakaway behavior that is easy to control
  • Exceptional steering feedback and stability at high speeds

Cons

  • High price point relative to overall value
  • Subpar wet-weather traction and traction loss under heavy acceleration
  • Noticeable road noise ('rumble') and a stiff, uncomfortable ride quality
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD07 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available101
Rim diameters13″ – 15″16″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG240 A A180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

Winner: Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 scores 68 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 scores 66 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 scores 71 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2 scores 70 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Exalto PE2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Exalto PE2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Exalto PE2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Exalto PE2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Exalto PE2 or ADVAN Neova AD07?

Michelin Pilot Exalto PE2, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology