Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 10 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ADVAN Neova AD07 64, ADVAN Fleva V701 65.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 67 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6668

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 68 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6664

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    ADVAN Neova AD07 +26
    36
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online5512

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.4 = 36

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)62
    Reviews found online5461

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6160

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 64

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 62 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5359

    ADVAN Neova AD07: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD07. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online6772
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Neova AD07Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 64 65
Dry 67 74
Wet 67 67
Snow 62 36
Comfort 59 62
Noise 64 69
Treadwear 58 69
Handling (owners) 67 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ADVAN Neova AD07

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Neova AD07

Pros

  • Stunning and reliable dry grip
  • Incredibly progressive breakaway behavior that is easy to control
  • Exceptional steering feedback and stability at high speeds

Cons

  • High price point relative to overall value
  • Subpar wet-weather traction and traction loss under heavy acceleration
  • Noticeable road noise ('rumble') and a stiff, uncomfortable ride quality
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD07 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available170
Rim diameters16″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG180 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Too close to call: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 is stronger on snow. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on treadwear, dry and noise. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 62 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 64 on noise.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Neova AD07 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Neova AD07 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Neova AD07 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ADVAN Neova AD07 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07, 62 vs 36 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ADVAN Neova AD07 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Neova AD07 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Neova AD07 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology