Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 453 reviews
“Less than 200 miles on this brand new pilot power 2ct, and I got a flat. A goddamn staple thing. What do?”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 453 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Road 5 is ahead, 75–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 453 reviews
“Less than 200 miles on this brand new pilot power 2ct, and I got a flat. A goddamn staple thing. What do?”
Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 79 · 24 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Power 2CT | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 67 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 79 |
Pilot Power 2CT: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71
Road 5: 60% × 67.4 + 40% × 78.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for Pilot Power 2CT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Pilot Power 2CT | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 78 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 83 |
Pilot Power 2CT: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
Road 5: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
No road tests of wet for Pilot Power 2CT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Pilot Power 2CT | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 80 |
Pilot Power 2CT: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70
Road 5: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 79.8 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Power 2CT or Road 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Power 2CT | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 75 |
Pilot Power 2CT: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
Road 5: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Power 2CT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Road 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Pilot Power 2CT | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 63 | 77 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Power 2CT | Michelin Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 75 |
| Dry | 71 | 72 |
| Wet | 67 | 80 |
| Comfort | 70 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Power 2CT
Road 5
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Riders generally view the Michelin Pilot Power 2CT as a proven, sticky sport tire offering dependable cornering grip and solid wet-weather performance at an attractive price point. While praised for street confidence and light track use, many note that modern sport-touring tires offer better tread life for heavy commuting or straight-line highway riding.
“I'm on my third set of Pilot Powers on my FZ1. The first two sets were slightly rough on the sides as they wore down. This third set grips just as well in the twisties but is 'pilling' much more heavily, on the sides of the tires. Since my riding style has not changed, the side compound has to be softer for this to happen. The center of the tire is still wearing smooth. B)”
“I have Pilot Power 2CT. Honestly, wish I had gotten the Road 5’s (at the time). My tires are stickier than I personally need. Unless you’re going full lean angle on the street, I think they’re a bit aggressive IMO.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by boredandstroked Its fine. I've ridden pilot sport/pilot power, power/2ct and 2ct/pure combos in the past. I also ride aggressively with canyon runs and freeway exchanges you can put your knee down on. The profile is the least of your worries as it changes as the tire wears out anyways. Tires are expensive as it is. When I bought my bike about 6 months ago, the rear tire was bald from the center - I figure due to "burn-outs". Front was good. There were Dunlops. So I changed the rear tire to Michelin 2CT and left the front as it was in good (about 80% new) condition. I ride hills, freeways, etc. I have not felt anything different. I'm still a noob, so may not be as aggressive as some of you guys, but I do tend to ride a little on aggressive side. Just my 2 cents. I'll probably get the front in another 3-5months, and go with the Michelins (2CT if available), otherwise...who knows...”
Based on 51 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Power 2CT | B · Michelin Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Michelin Pilot Power 2CT
Michelin Road 5
Winner: Michelin Road 5 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Road 5 scores 77 vs 63 on handling.
Michelin Road 5 scores 80 vs 67 on wet.
Michelin Road 5 scores 76 vs 70 on comfort.
Michelin Road 5 scores 72 vs 66 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Road 5, 80 vs 67 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Michelin Road 5, 76 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Michelin Road 5, 72 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology