Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 4 road tests and 1,373 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 80–54

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
± 5

Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,373 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”

Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire BLaufenn

S fit EQ

Summer

± 9

Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 54 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +35
    51
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 3 tests8649
    Reviews found online8654

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86 + 40% × 86.4 = 86

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.9 + 40% × 53.9 = 51

  2. 91

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +42
    49
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 3 tests9446
    Reviews found online8754

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 94 + 40% × 86.6 = 91

    S fit EQ: 60% × 46 + 40% × 53.8 = 49

  3. 64

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests54≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7154

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54.2 + 60% × 71.1 = 64

    S fit EQ: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for S fit EQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 58

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +2
    56
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 1 tests5349
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 58

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 56

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 72

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7764
    Reviews found online6556

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 72

    S fit EQ: 60% × 64 + 40% × 55.7 = 61

  6. 83

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +36
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQ
    Reviews found online8347
  7. 64

    Efficiency

    S fit EQ +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 1 tests6471
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Laufenn S fit EQ: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUVLaufenn S fit EQ
Relative Score 80 54
Dry 86 51
Wet 91 49
Comfort 64 59
Noise 58 56
Treadwear 72 61
Handling (owners) 83 47
Efficiency 64 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

± 9

S fit EQ

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 4 SUVS fit EQΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 91% #35/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 89% #8/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 92% #9/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 95% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 77% #42/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 95% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 93% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 92% #14/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 97% #2/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test 77% #10/12 · 2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 86% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 89% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/9 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test #12/10 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling

Cons

  • Higher-than-average purchase price
  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
  • Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 SUV review

Tire B S fit EQ

Pros

  • Attractive price point offering high value for money
  • Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
  • Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
  • Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
All owner themes in the S fit EQ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.

Top themes
#Summer temperature limitations#Grip and handling performance#Tread life and wear#Comparison with Latitude Sport 3#Ride comfort and firmness#SUV-specific load design

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Laufenn S fit EQ

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV B · Laufenn S fit EQ
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6524
Rim diameters17″ – 23″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Laufenn S fit EQ

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 56 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 64 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or S fit EQ?

Laufenn S fit EQ, 71 vs 64 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology