Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,371 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 10 road tests and 1,371 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 SUV leads, 80–78 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 70 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
86
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +878Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 9 tests 86 82 Reviews found online 86 71 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86 + 40% × 86.4 = 86
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 78
-
91
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1279Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 9 tests 94 83 Reviews found online 87 74 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 94 + 40% × 86.7 = 91
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 73.8 = 79
-
64
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +771Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests 54 73 Reviews found online 71 69 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54.2 + 60% × 71.2 = 64
Primacy 4+: 40% × 73.3 + 60% × 69 = 71
-
58
Noise
Primacy 4+ +1573Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 7 tests 53 77 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 58
Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +1385Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 77 95 Reviews found online 65 69 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 65.3 = 72
Primacy 4+: 60% × 95.3 + 40% × 68.9 = 85
-
83
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1865Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 83 65 -
64
Efficiency
Primacy 4+ +1478Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 8 tests 64 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 78 |
| Dry | 86 | 78 |
| Wet | 91 | 79 |
| Comfort | 64 | 71 |
| Noise | 58 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 85 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 65 |
| Efficiency | 64 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
78
/ 100
Primacy 4+
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Primacy 4+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 96% #3/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 98% #4/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% #1/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | 92% #5/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 99% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 86% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 82% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 91% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 97% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 95% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 40% #4/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | 88% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 93% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 96% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 88% #3/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 100% #1/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 97% #2/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 92% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Range | Efficiency | 95% #3/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | 92% #3/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 90% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 49% #11/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 52% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #7/8 2024 EV Tyre Test | #5/8 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 62% #7/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 67% #8/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/9 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | #4/8 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Pros
- Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
- Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling
Cons
- Higher-than-average purchase price
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
- Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2022-02-01
“From 3 model you mention, only Alenza is designed for heavy vehicle/SUV, so longevity is better than other 2 for your Envoy even though the traction may not be the best. If you can find Pilot Sport 4 SUV, then it may be the best to replace Latitude Sport 3. I like Latitude Sport 3, the best in wet weather and great in dry, but it is true it is only 25000 miles lifetime.”
rennlist.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by robtr8 I like to use the tire size calculator on 1010Tires.com. Shows 285/40's as being almost 3% bigger than the OE size. Generally speaking you want no more than a 1% different. The PS 4 SUV's are available in a 295/35. Rocketcar - if you had P-Zero's then yup. They suck. Took them off the F Type immediately if not sooner. Quote: Originally Posted by RAudi Driver That's why they are called P-Zeros. If they were good Pirelli would have named them P-10's. Quote: Originally Posted by BrettIsAwesomer Not a fan of the LS3 on my Cayenne. They came on the car when I bought it but will replace with Pilot Sport 4 SUV later this year. There are some stretches of road where the surface conditions change and I get a terrible droning noise in the cabin with the LS3. However, in my Cayman with PS4S in the same areas you can barely tell the road surface changed. The wear on both sets is about the same. 2016 Cayenne S e-Hybrid with 21" Latitude Sport 3 (295/35) 2014 Cayman with 20" Pilot Sport 4S (235-265/35) I am putting an OPC warranty on the Cayenne, so for me the LS3 is is best N rated tyre available...”
r/CX5
·103 upvotes ·2021-05-15
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Top themes
#Summer temperature limitations#Grip and handling performance#Tread life and wear#Comparison with Latitude Sport 3#Ride comfort and firmness#SUV-specific load design
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Michelin Primacy 4+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 65 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Sizes in common | 7 | 7 |
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
78
/ 100
Michelin Primacy 4+
Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Michelin Primacy 4+ if noise, efficiency and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 73 vs 58 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 64 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 72 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire B · Michelin Primacy 4+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 79 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 78 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 73 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 71 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 64 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology