tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 0 road tests and 1,383 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 83–60

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Summer

± 5

Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,383 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +25
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests86≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8657

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 85.9 = 86

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 91

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +33
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests93≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online8653

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 86.4 = 91

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests54≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7159

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54 + 60% × 70.5 = 64

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 58

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests53–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 58

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 72

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 65.3 = 72

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 83

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +28
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online8355
  7. 64

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4 SUVGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests64–
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUVYokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 83 60
Dry 86 61
Wet 91 58
Comfort 64 62
Noise 58 –
Treadwear 72 65
Handling (owners) 83 55
Efficiency 64 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

± 8

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling

Cons

  • Higher-than-average purchase price
  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
  • Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 SUV review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Positive

Community members generally praise the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV for its strong grip, handling performance, and SUV-specific design. Users frequently consider it an upgrade over OEM options like the Latitude Sport 3, though some discuss its premium price, summer temperature limitations, and expected tread longevity.

r/Howsmytire ·1 upvote ·2026-07-15

“Used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV I am looking to buy these used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires. They have 7+ mm thread left, DOT 0923. I am wondering why the two tires on the right are so rough / full of small holes, while the ones on the left are so smooth. Probably the right ones were on the front, but still what could this condition be indicating? I still haven't been to the shop to see them and feel how is the rubber, wanted to hear an advice first.”
r/CX5 ·103 upvotes ·2021-05-15

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-02-01

“From 3 model you mention, only Alenza is designed for heavy vehicle/SUV, so longevity is better than other 2 for your Envoy even though the traction may not be the best. If you can find Pilot Sport 4 SUV, then it may be the best to replace Latitude Sport 3. I like Latitude Sport 3, the best in wet weather and great in dry, but it is true it is only 25000 miles lifetime.”
Top themes
#grip and handling#SUV-specific performance#tread life longevity#Latitude Sport 3 comparison#summer tire limitations#premium pricing

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available65—
Rim diameters17″ – 23″—
UTQG220 - 320 A - AA A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology