Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 2 road tests and 12,691 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 84–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,691 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
± 6

Tests 62 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +10
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 2 tests8979
    Reviews found online8574

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.1 + 40% × 84.5 = 87

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 73.9 = 77

  2. 90

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +38
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 2 tests9345
    Reviews found online8563

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 93.1 + 40% × 84.7 = 90

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 45 + 40% × 63.3 = 52

  3. 77

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests83≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7272

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 83.4 + 60% × 72.4 = 77

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 71.6 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +17
    54
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests78≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6046

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Reviews found online8173
  7. 76

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests76–
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Relative Score 84 64
Dry 87 77
Wet 90 52
Comfort 77 71
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 71 54
Handling (owners) 81 73
Efficiency 76 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 4

± 6

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 4Pilot Sport Cup 2 RΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 96% #2/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 99% #3/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 70% #8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 85% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 70% #4/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 93% #4/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/9 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 #5/5 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

Tire B Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
  • Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
  • Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2

Cons

  • Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
  • Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
  • Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 R review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

r/WRXSTi ·149 upvotes ·2025-07-09

“New tires Pilot Sport 4s got some new Pilot Sport 4s in 245/40/18. way different to my yokohama advan AS+. a lot more grip, obviously. very minimal to no sidewall flex. very good tires. i had pilot sport 3's on my 2013 hatchback wrx back in the day. feels good to get back on some good tires again.”

team-bhp.com

“I ran the stock 17" Ecopia's on my Ecosport for about 45k km. Luckily didn't face any side wall cuts. Overall it was a average tyre with decent grip levels - good grip without any squealing when driving up a ghat road quite enthusiastically even at the fag end of it's life. Ride quality was pretty bad and the smallest of ruts would result in a thud and being low profile amplified it even more. The tyres developed these cracks along the shoulder around the 35-40k mark which should not have happened due to which I changed them at 45k even though there was probably enough thread for about 5-10k km more. Moved to the Michelin PS4 now and the difference is night and day!”

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by ua549 In over 55 years of driving I've never gotten more than 20k miles on a set of tires. Michelin Pilot Sport is the worst at 6k miles twice in a row with free factory replacements though I've gotten 18k miles on Michelin AS3 tires once or twice. Dunlop Sport is second at 15k miles. Overall Pirelli Cinturato P7 are the longest wearing tires I've owned over the years at 20k miles consistently. I swap out run flat tires if they come on a new car. I believe that heat is a major cause of tire wear. Even after a 2 mile trip @ 35 mph the tires on my E300 register about 120°F. Cold they are between 80°F and 85°F. In the dead of winter they are 5° colder. The OEM tires on my 5 year old '18 E300 got 12k miles. The car has 20k miles on it now and the P7 tires are about 40% worn. My experience with Summer tires is 15 to 18k max. The only Summer tires that I have owned that lasted more than 20 were the Pilot Sport PS4...which BTW is one of their marketing highlights, longer tread wear...though still shorter than all seasons which normally are rated for 30k or more.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available627
Rim diameters16″ – 20″20″ – 21″
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 90 vs 52 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 71 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 73 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 90 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 77 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 77 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 or Pilot Sport Cup 2 R?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology